Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 56419 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2010 11:05:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2010 11:05:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 36377 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2010 11:05:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 36290 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2010 11:05:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 36280 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2010 11:05:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:05:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [61.9.168.143] (HELO nskntmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com) (61.9.168.143) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:05:08 +0000 Received: from nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com ([58.166.68.133]) by nskntmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20100118110446.YJAG1310.nskntmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com> for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:04:46 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.10] (really [58.166.68.133]) by nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20100118110445.OAQW24930.nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com@[10.0.0.10]> for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:04:45 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Subject: Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5 From: Brett Porter In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:04:44 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <64C63897-D7C2-486A-A035-E74759D26A8D@apache.org> References: To: dev@continuum.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-RPD-ScanID: Class unknown; VirusThreatLevel unknown, RefID str=0001.0A150203.4B54404D.0131,ss=1,fgs=0 +1 for Beta. I built the from the source bundle (after checking the signatures). I = was able to run and build a project. I still have trouble configuring distributed builds out of the box - = possibly just my misreading the documentation. We need to review this = before a GA and whether we can make it simpler IMO. - Brett On 13/01/2010, at 6:36 PM, Marica Tan wrote: > Hi >=20 > The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged. >=20 > This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release = notes > here: > = http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=3D10540&version= =3D15641 >=20 > While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums, = can be > downloaded here: > = http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/c= ontinuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/ >=20 > = > = http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/c= ontinuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/ >=20 > = > = http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/c= ontinuum/continuum/1.3.5/ >=20 > = > = http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/c= ontinuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/ >=20 > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback. >=20 > [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because... >=20 > The vote will be open for 72 hours. >=20 >=20 > Thanks, > -- > Marica >=20 >=20 > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan = wrote: >=20 >> I'll start the release today :-) >>=20 >>=20 >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak = wrote: >>=20 >>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse >>> wrote: >>>> Is it a GA release? I think it should be. >>>=20 >>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop me >>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on = the >>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a problem >>> there too. >>>=20 >>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA >>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338. >>>=20 >>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's already >>> been four months since 1.3.4. >>>=20 >>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3 >>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be = the >>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA. >>>=20 >>> -- >>> Wendy >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 -- Brett Porter brett@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/