Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48916 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2010 23:42:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2010 23:42:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 95358 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2010 23:42:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 95265 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2010 23:42:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 95255 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2010 23:42:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:42:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.219.192.166] (HELO smtp.bredband2.com) (83.219.192.166) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:42:01 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.3] (c-94-255-200-136.cust.bredband2.com [94.255.200.136]) (Authenticated sender: ed5133) by smtp.bredband2.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9606911195A for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:41:25 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B4FABA5.8020301@apache.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:41:25 +0100 From: Dennis Lundberg User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@continuum.apache.org Subject: Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5 References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bredband2-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Bredband2-MailScanner-From: dennisl@apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No It seems I just missed the release train with my documentation improvements. Sorry about that. Marica Tan wrote: > Hi > > The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged. > > This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release notes > here: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641 > > While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums, can be > downloaded here: > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/ > > > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/ > > > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/ > > > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/ > > Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback. > > [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because... > > The vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > Thanks, > -- > Marica > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan wrote: > >> I'll start the release today :-) >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse >>> wrote: >>>> Is it a GA release? I think it should be. >>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop me >>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on the >>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a problem >>> there too. >>> >>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA >>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338. >>> >>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's already >>> been four months since 1.3.4. >>> >>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3 >>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be the >>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA. >>> >>> -- >>> Wendy >>> >> > -- Dennis Lundberg