continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marica Tan <marica....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5
Date Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:47:02 GMT
Sorry missed that one :)

Thanks,
--
Marica

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:

> Checking with infra, since I see it through the proxy and not on the live
> site.
>
> BTW, I Think you forgot to update the home page?
>
> - Brett
>
> On 20/01/2010, at 10:03 AM, Marica Tan wrote:
>
> > I already published the site and the reference docs yesterday (mvn
> > site-deply both on the release tag and the continuum site) but when I
> > visited the following links, I don't see any changes at all.
> >
> > http://continuum.apache.org/
> > http://continuum.apache.org/docs/1.3.5
> >
> >
> > Can anyone help me with this :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > Marica
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Marica Tan <marica.tan@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> The vote has passed with the following results:
> >>
> >> +1s  3 binding: Wendy, Brett, Marica
> >>         1 non-binding: Brent
> >> No -1s and 0s
> >>
> >>
> >> I'll finalize the release.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> --
> >> Marica
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Marica Tan <marica.tan@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 for Beta.
> >>>
> >>> - verified signatures and checksums
> >>> - tried simple build/release both in a distributed and non-distributed
> >>> build scenarios
> >>>
> >>> - Marica
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 for Beta.
> >>>>
> >>>> I built the from the source bundle (after checking the signatures).
I
> was
> >>>> able to run and build a project.
> >>>>
> >>>> I still have trouble configuring distributed builds out of the box -
> >>>> possibly just my misreading the documentation. We need to review this
> before
> >>>> a GA and whether we can make it simpler IMO.
> >>>>
> >>>> - Brett
> >>>>
> >>>> On 13/01/2010, at 6:36 PM, Marica Tan wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release
> >>>> notes
> >>>>> here:
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641
> >>>>>
> >>>>> While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums,
> >>>> can be
> >>>>> downloaded here:
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <
> >>>>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <
> >>>>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <
> >>>>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Marica
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <marica.tan@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I'll start the release today :-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse
> >>>>>>> <emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would
stop
> me
> >>>>>>> from calling it GA.  I reproduced it on trunk.  I didn't
try it on
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's
a
> problem
> >>>>>>> there too.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria
for a GA
> >>>>>>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. 
It's
> already
> >>>>>>> been four months since 1.3.4.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick
(2-3
> >>>>>>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes
would be
> the
> >>>>>>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Wendy
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Brett Porter
> >>>> brett@apache.org
> >>>> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
>
>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message