Hi
The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged.
This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release notes
here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641
While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums, can be
downloaded here:
http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
<http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/>
http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
<http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/>
http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
<http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/>
http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/
Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
[ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
The vote will be open for 72 hours.
Thanks,
--
Marica
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <marica.tan@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll start the release today :-)
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse
>> <emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
>>
>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would stop me
>> from calling it GA. I reproduced it on trunk. I didn't try it on the
>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a problem
>> there too.
>>
>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for a GA
>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338.
>>
>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this. It's already
>> been four months since 1.3.4.
>>
>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3
>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would be the
>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA.
>>
>> --
>> Wendy
>>
>
>
|