continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.3.5
Date Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:16:32 GMT
Checking with infra, since I see it through the proxy and not on the live site.

BTW, I Think you forgot to update the home page?

- Brett

On 20/01/2010, at 10:03 AM, Marica Tan wrote:

> I already published the site and the reference docs yesterday (mvn
> site-deply both on the release tag and the continuum site) but when I
> visited the following links, I don't see any changes at all.
> 
> http://continuum.apache.org/
> http://continuum.apache.org/docs/1.3.5
> 
> 
> Can anyone help me with this :)
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> Marica
> 
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Marica Tan <marica.tan@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> The vote has passed with the following results:
>> 
>> +1s  3 binding: Wendy, Brett, Marica
>>         1 non-binding: Brent
>> No -1s and 0s
>> 
>> 
>> I'll finalize the release.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Marica
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Marica Tan <marica.tan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 for Beta.
>>> 
>>> - verified signatures and checksums
>>> - tried simple build/release both in a distributed and non-distributed
>>> build scenarios
>>> 
>>> - Marica
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> +1 for Beta.
>>>> 
>>>> I built the from the source bundle (after checking the signatures). I was
>>>> able to run and build a project.
>>>> 
>>>> I still have trouble configuring distributed builds out of the box -
>>>> possibly just my misreading the documentation. We need to review this before
>>>> a GA and whether we can make it simpler IMO.
>>>> 
>>>> - Brett
>>>> 
>>>> On 13/01/2010, at 6:36 PM, Marica Tan wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi
>>>>> 
>>>>> The Continuum 1.3.5 release candidate has been staged.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This release includes 23 fixes. You can take a look at the release
>>>> notes
>>>>> here:
>>>>> 
>>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10540&version=15641
>>>>> 
>>>>> While the binaries, including the sources, signatures and checksums,
>>>> can be
>>>>> downloaded here:
>>>>> 
>>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
>>>>> 
>>>>> <
>>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-jetty/1.3.5/
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
>>>>> 
>>>>> <
>>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent-jetty/1.3.5/
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
>>>>> 
>>>>> <
>>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum/1.3.5/
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-continuum/org/apache/continuum/continuum-buildagent/1.3.5/
>>>>> 
>>>>> Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
>>>>> 
>>>>> [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because...
>>>>> 
>>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> --
>>>>> Marica
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Marica Tan <marica.tan@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'll start the release today :-)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Emmanuel Venisse
>>>>>>> <emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Is it a GA release? I think it should be.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2423 would
stop me
>>>>>>> from calling it GA.  I reproduced it on trunk.  I didn't try
it on
>>>> the
>>>>>>> branch, but it was reported against 1.3.4 so I assume it's a
problem
>>>>>>> there too.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> A smooth upgrade path is on my personal list of criteria for
a GA
>>>>>>> release as well, so I agree with Marica about 2338.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I don't, however, want to delay 1.3.5 for any of this.  It's
already
>>>>>>> been four months since 1.3.4.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Though we don't have a good track record at it, IMO a quick (2-3
>>>>>>> weeks?) 1.3.6 with a *limited* number of important fixes would
be the
>>>>>>> way to go to finally get 1.3.x to GA.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Wendy
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Brett Porter
>>>> brett@apache.org
>>>> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://brettporter.wordpress.com/





Mime
View raw message