Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 74869 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2009 02:23:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Aug 2009 02:23:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 34919 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2009 02:23:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 34833 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2009 02:23:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 34823 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2009 02:23:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 02:23:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.222.179] (HELO mail-pz0-f179.google.com) (209.85.222.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 02:23:25 +0000 Received: by pzk9 with SMTP id 9so686121pzk.10 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:23:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.38.32 with SMTP id q32mr5055541waj.8.1251080584976; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:23:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.104.17? (99-48-201-217.lightspeed.gdrpmi.sbcglobal.net [99.48.201.217]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm809372pzk.14.2009.08.23.19.23.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:23:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Brett Porter Message-Id: From: Brett Porter To: dev@continuum.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: 1.3.x branch GA release Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:22:51 -0400 References: <8667b1bd0908212259v7a84398ej51bc6c8aecf68aeb@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org We have an Archiva instance on vmbuild that you could push them to for staging. WDYT? On 23/08/2009, at 7:56 PM, Marica Tan wrote: > Updates: > > I wasn't able to release continuum this weekend because minotaur is > down. I > will continue with the release once it's up. > > > Thanks > -- > Marica > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Deng Ching wrote: > >> FYI, Modello 1.1 and Redback 1.2.2 are now available :) >> >> Thanks, >> Deng >> >> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Marica Tan >> wrote: >> >>> I think it's time to have the GA release for the 1.3.x branch. >>> >>> There are 6 remaining issues scheduled for 1.3.4. >>> >>> CONTINUUM-2163 Getting an unrecognized tag: 'scmResult' when >>> upgrading >> from >>> 1.3.1 to 1.3.x using data management cli. >>> CONTINUUM-2284 Performance improvement >>> CONTINUUM-2194 Unable to backup/restore users database from >>> Redback 1.2 >>> using data management cli >>> CONTINUUM-2326 Add documentation for releasing using distributed >>> builds >>> CONTINUUM-2141 Upgrade Modello to latest version so the model will >>> be in >>> java 5 format >>> CONTINUUM-2336 Upgrade Redback to 1.3 >>> >>> For CONTINUUM-2163, we need MODELLO to release 1.1 because the fix >>> is >>> included in that version. I already started the changes for >> CONTINUUM-2141 >>> locally and so far the only problem I encountered is in redback- >>> legacy >>> because I'm getting a compilation error when using java5 (I can >>> just set >>> java5 to false for the meantime in redback-legacy). Will commit >>> the fix >>> later. >>> >>> As for CONTINUUM-2194, it has a dependency on redback's issues >>> which I >>> already committed the fixes on redback's trunk and continuum is >>> now using >>> redback 1.3-SNAPSHOT. I will also commit the fix for CONTINUUM-2194 >> later. >>> >>> CONTINUUM-2284 is assigned to Emmanuel and I think there are some >>> commits >>> related to this (r787643, r787660, r788260, r788572, r788574). >>> Are there >>> any more work for this that should be included in 1.3.4 or can we >>> bump >> this >>> to 1.4.0 instead? >>> >>> I'm planning to release 1.3.4 RC hopefully this weekend. Any >>> objections, >>> comments or suggestions? >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -- >>> Marica >>> >>