continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marica Tan <marica....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 1.3.x branch GA release
Date Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:56:50 GMT
Updates:

I wasn't able to release continuum this weekend because minotaur is down. I
will continue with the release once it's up.


Thanks
--
Marica

On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Deng Ching <oching@apache.org> wrote:

> FYI, Modello 1.1 and Redback 1.2.2 are now available :)
>
> Thanks,
> Deng
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Marica Tan <marica.tan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think it's time to have the GA release for the 1.3.x branch.
> >
> > There are 6 remaining issues scheduled for 1.3.4.
> >
> > CONTINUUM-2163 Getting an unrecognized tag: 'scmResult' when upgrading
> from
> > 1.3.1 to 1.3.x using data management cli.
> > CONTINUUM-2284 Performance improvement
> > CONTINUUM-2194 Unable to backup/restore users database from Redback 1.2
> > using data management cli
> > CONTINUUM-2326 Add documentation for releasing using distributed builds
> > CONTINUUM-2141 Upgrade Modello to latest version so the model will be in
> > java 5 format
> > CONTINUUM-2336 Upgrade Redback to 1.3
> >
> > For CONTINUUM-2163, we need MODELLO to release 1.1 because the fix is
> > included in that version. I already started the changes for
> CONTINUUM-2141
> > locally and so far the only problem I encountered is in redback-legacy
> > because I'm getting a compilation error when using java5 (I can just set
> > java5 to false for the meantime in redback-legacy). Will commit the fix
> > later.
> >
> > As for CONTINUUM-2194, it has a dependency on redback's issues which I
> > already committed the fixes on redback's trunk and continuum is now using
> > redback 1.3-SNAPSHOT. I will also commit the fix for CONTINUUM-2194
> later.
> >
> > CONTINUUM-2284 is assigned to Emmanuel and I think there are some commits
> > related to this (r787643, r787660, r788260, r788572, r788574).  Are there
> > any more work for this that should be included in 1.3.4 or can we bump
> this
> > to 1.4.0 instead?
> >
> > I'm planning to release 1.3.4 RC hopefully this weekend. Any objections,
> > comments or suggestions?
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > Marica
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message