continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Venisse <emmanuel.veni...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: separating the builder code from the UI
Date Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:55:07 GMT
After a big review of the code, I think it would be better to do it in a
branch and rewrite each part one by one to clean correctly all the code.

Emmanuel

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm not likely to be the one doing most of the work, and it doesn't
> really look like we'll have competing branches that we'll have to
> decide between, so it's fine with me. :)
>
> Re: the problem of merging to trunk... I don't see that happening.  If
> a branch shapes up to be Continuum 2.0, I'd expect that we just _move_
> it to trunk.
>
> But again if those that are doing the work want to do it on "trunk"
> rather than "continuum-NEXT", go for it!  They're all just directories
> in Subversion that can be moved around at any time we decide to.
>
> --
> Wendy
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Emmanuel
> Venisse<emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'd prefer to decide what will be Continuum 2.0. I won't like to start to
> > work on a new architecture if we aren't sure because we'll spend lot of
> time
> > to write a POC, so personnaly, I'd prefer to start directly in trunk.
> ...
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message