Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 64834 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2009 15:05:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jun 2009 15:05:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 9027 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2009 15:05:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 8955 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2009 15:05:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 8945 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2009 15:05:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:05:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wsmoak@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.147 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.147] (HELO qw-out-1920.google.com) (74.125.92.147) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:05:24 +0000 Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so579637qwc.14 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:05:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=T5WWomrsdPyqwWjufVihXt8/BPU6uUHrSWjXKhTbVU8=; b=eUCkCyMwNkwq3q3avAS9f3T6L7L8z4Z2v5jH9fPyBxusPlLBQ+yyr16EKzSpy1ZZ4R 0aZcFmCLRyc67Ei5LZPijQV1daeh9vorlgQ3GlcHVhNDaaE9/ZC0aprS+WDjrDj6V0aQ vwWNsWFPKLXROK9HuMcAA+85U7EFB4PLJNfcs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ij8UE3yNjmQ+iMuDYPt2h3wrn8+sgKUT5sTGbAeSwEbsGfpVXVDlvxysHx9gfLW41J x7yRZEIAI57bhkb3wMYjYrFkxB18RVK4WbfWuQrdc4W111IvxN6zsCgkeR+Gl6xPxrCd PpszNjl7//gtUz7ZK9KpKP/9xK/nXkdJHMMY0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.20.83 with SMTP id e19mr2148096qab.376.1245942303208; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:05:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Wendy Smoak Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:04:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Developer docs To: dev@continuum.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I would love to see work on this! As I just posted on the old "Separating the builder from the UI" thread, my preference is a code-named branch. (Yeah, the poms will probably say 2.0-SNAPSHOT. :) ) Let's see it working before we decide "this is the 2.0 trunk". -- Wendy On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > Thanks. > > What do you think if we create a branch for continuum 1.4.x to continue the > development and use the trunk to start the implementation of the new > architecture (Continuum 2)?