Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 74256 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2009 23:56:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jun 2009 23:56:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 24618 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2009 23:56:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 24514 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2009 23:56:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 24503 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2009 23:56:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:56:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of odeaching@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.193 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.193] (HELO mail-qy0-f193.google.com) (209.85.221.193) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:56:08 +0000 Received: by qyk31 with SMTP id 31so4750650qyk.10 for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:55:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=6HDPBypdE6ARJOA7g2vLvr6LVpCsWVFhYInno/AIFqM=; b=YPl5kSZ1R1luSMjLyoP/5xJSVViPO5Vt8XQd4ORcpr6H3hY1CFy70aedwtyTNH4CKm FoaWu7GY73bJ6oBfu4RzBLJPCvmSP4ueRhQrQ2SrzXO4PUxUYEcPHEBuUbZuWneZZz3f 0PUi2+Yrc3TvgjuIgfgfupMQfFAKiKVEkDHqA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=kMWyyXkw5OjZ99t2F75IJgsdkJBy/SDwjg3pvPEXwpl/olyHnaFKrqNW4yF2X1xqDe GCu4xDbmXFVkN5cJBCB/C7Wsamg9bX4UK2VWC14zm/TUGfqu1jf8UVzQBzdJt08xURFK zWqMQYhujwIvdLFrmHimxhEIm4JtulUILTyFA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: odeaching@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.81.70 with SMTP id w6mr1196082qck.11.1245023747127; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:55:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:55:47 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7ae377b802ef83d2 Message-ID: <8667b1bd0906141655y291eb447vaf80b7a5e5405824@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Prepare Build Queue question From: Deng Ching To: dev@continuum.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163646d4fa2f3b30046c57ae2c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163646d4fa2f3b30046c57ae2c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Emm, We're not using parallel queues for the prepare build queue. Only the checkout and build queues use parallel queues.. Thanks, Deng On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Emmanuel Venisse < emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Do we use some parallel queues to do checkout/update or do we have only one > queue? > I think it is only one because the checkout/updates on vmbuild is very > long. > > Emmanuel > --00163646d4fa2f3b30046c57ae2c--