continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Venisse <emmanuel.veni...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Developer docs
Date Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:17:34 GMT
If we create a branch, the merge to trunk will be a big work because we have
lot of work to implement the new architecture.

Emmanuel

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would love to see work on this!  As I just posted on the old
> "Separating the builder from the UI" thread, my preference is a
> code-named branch.  (Yeah, the poms will probably say 2.0-SNAPSHOT. :)
> )  Let's see it working before we decide "this is the 2.0 trunk".
>
> --
> Wendy
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Emmanuel
> Venisse<emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks.
> >
> > What do you think if we create a branch for continuum 1.4.x to continue
> the
> > development and use the trunk to start the implementation of the new
> > architecture (Continuum 2)?
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message