continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Wendy Smoak <>
Subject Re: separating the builder code from the UI
Date Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:34:43 GMT
I'm not likely to be the one doing most of the work, and it doesn't
really look like we'll have competing branches that we'll have to
decide between, so it's fine with me. :)

Re: the problem of merging to trunk... I don't see that happening.  If
a branch shapes up to be Continuum 2.0, I'd expect that we just _move_
it to trunk.

But again if those that are doing the work want to do it on "trunk"
rather than "continuum-NEXT", go for it!  They're all just directories
in Subversion that can be moved around at any time we decide to.


On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Emmanuel
Venisse<> wrote:
> I'd prefer to decide what will be Continuum 2.0. I won't like to start to
> work on a new architecture if we aren't sure because we'll spend lot of time
> to write a POC, so personnaly, I'd prefer to start directly in trunk.

View raw message