Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53031 invoked from network); 29 May 2009 11:58:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 May 2009 11:58:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 54990 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2009 11:58:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 54900 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2009 11:58:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 54890 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2009 11:58:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 May 2009 11:58:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.226 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.226] (HELO mail-bw0-f226.google.com) (209.85.218.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 May 2009 11:58:03 +0000 Received: by bwz26 with SMTP id 26so6395191bwz.2 for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 04:57:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tf/rMrbKLJhgNqE3DTXqfws9I/HGICNJ2+z4P/U4Hw4=; b=C15ryeN4WNK/L5490xgVB1njNXnvm2TFieZYo/IHks17ygqUCKPElHw6UKT2ECqeqq MI7SGJan74Obmv2pSzT+MW9imrlZa0SznSaL2bhk0mbhhva3Yf1LVcM/ypp44z8+Km+V jckEeb7zUw5I8JrPiBpB1CjSYdxueSSQCMcCw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=GNBPMPpFuPp5XYu+6Wtv7twB8vKz5tAec61dMC2jiF++2bgqmEncnuT8R3RWts9rho gImyzKerSu2tOa39JEFBjJhE/UCxGt7HL/KS5H7GZN3nz8UUPQ1WOC+08rMRygoIGAQP b8yUB2NpM6O5kO4oqrt+QSxkx5W/Wg0RnBck0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.118.141 with SMTP id v13mr1985864faq.26.1243598263004; Fri, 29 May 2009 04:57:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9C22F214-CB7E-4F13-9C1D-0016E9004F71@apache.org> References: <0E6DE2BD-727C-4C81-9C85-D475FC3C1E7C@apache.org> <2B6DE053-3D9E-4222-A4E4-C557D39DFC7F@apache.org> <9C22F214-CB7E-4F13-9C1D-0016E9004F71@apache.org> Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:57:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: stability problems on vmbuild From: Emmanuel Venisse To: dev@continuum.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5ad51b5ad50046b0bc8fe X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001636c5ad51b5ad50046b0bc8fe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > > On 29/05/2009, at 7:15 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > > I fixed it in plexus-utils in r.8235 >> > > Ah, I've unsubscribed from the plexus lists so I missed it. > > >> I see in svn logs of plexus-utils that 1.5.10 was released yesterday but >> on >> central repo, it was deployed 3 days ago( >> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-utils/1.5.10/ ). >> Is >> it a problem with the date on central repo or is it the wrong artifact? So >> I >> don't know if the artifact on central repo contains or not my fix and the >> sources jar is wrong :-( >> > > It no longer matches, so you'll need to release again. I can't do it, so I sent a mail to John on the plexus list to release it again and to sync it with the central repo > > http://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/plexus-releases/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-utils/1.5.10/ > > Thanks for fixing this! np Emmanuel --001636c5ad51b5ad50046b0bc8fe--