cool, thanks! On 19/05/2009, at 12:37 AM, Marica Tan wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Brett Porter > wrote: > >> HI Marica, >> >> On 19/05/2009, at 12:07 AM, ctan@apache.org wrote: >> >> Author: ctan >>> Date: Mon May 18 14:07:51 2009 >>> New Revision: 775961 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=775961&view=rev >>> Log: >>> [CONTINUUM-1712] added jpox project summary to improve performance >>> of >>> group summary page >>> merge -r 775955:775956 of 1.3.x branch >>> >> >> sounds like a good idea. I'm wondering, do we know of the cause >> that it >> slowed down? If the project requests have a misconfigured fetch >> group it >> might affect the overall performance of the system, not just the >> front page. >> >> I think it just something to do with having a large number of project > groups and projects. > > But we may need to investigate this some more just to be sure. > >> >> >> Modified: continuum/trunk/continuum-webapp/src/main/mdo/view- >> models.mdo >>> URL: >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/continuum/trunk/continuum-webapp/src/main/mdo/view-models.mdo?rev=775961&r1=775960&r2=775961&view=diff >>> >>> = >>> = >>> = >>> = >>> = >>> = >>> = >>> = >>> = >>> = >>> ==================================================================== >>> --- continuum/trunk/continuum-webapp/src/main/mdo/view-models.mdo >>> (original) >>> +++ continuum/trunk/continuum-webapp/src/main/mdo/view-models.mdo >>> Mon May >>> 18 14:07:51 2009 >>> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ >>> true >>> number of successful builds in the project >>> group >>> int >>> - -1 >>> + 0 >>> >>> >>> numFailures >>> @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ >>> true >>> number of failed builds in the project >>> group >>> int >>> - -1 >>> + 0 >>> >>> >>> numErrors >>> @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ >>> true >>> number of errored builds in the project >>> group >>> int >>> - -1 >>> + 0 >>> >>> >>> repositoryId >>> >>> >>> >> I'm not sure how this is relevant to the change? Does this change >> have any >> other impact? >> > > Other classes that uses this class also sets the initial values of > these > fields to 0 so no impact. > >> >> - Brett >> >>