continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Building a project with data changed
Date Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:49:02 GMT
Looks good to me!

On 22/04/2009, at 10:48 AM, José Morales Martínez wrote:

> I have created issue CONTINUUM-2188. What do you think about this?
>
> I am working in this matter.
>
> -------
> Jose
>
> ________________________________________
> De: Brett Porter [brett@apache.org]
> Enviado el: lunes, 20 de abril de 2009 7:12
> Para: dev@continuum.apache.org
> Asunto: Re: Building a project with data changed
>
> Sorry for the delayed response. I think this might be overkill - I'd
> be happy with just a checkbox about whether to update or not on the
> build definition rather than attaching another thing like this to it
> for now.
>
> - Brett
>
> On 09/04/2009, at 3:17 AM, José Morales Martínez wrote:
>
>> Brett, it is a good idea.
>> I propose a new select field in Build Definition. Something like
>> 'Update policy' where you can select your update policy.
>>
>> Update policy would be defined in new Administration Menu and its
>> design could be something like to it:
>>
>> Update Policy
>> --------------
>>
>> Name: ....
>>
>> Field Updated           Current POM     New POM
>>
>> Project name
>> Description                                 X
>> Version                      X              X
>> SCM Url                      X              X
>> SCM Tag                      X              X
>>
>> X       Don't Uptade fields for new POM
>>
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> If you think it is a good idea I'm going to start in it.
>> -----------------------
>> Jose
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Brett Porter [mailto:brett@apache.org]
>> Sent: mié 08/04/2009 16:14
>> To: dev@continuum.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Building a project with data changed
>>
>> I like (2) as a sensible middle ground. Let the user decide.
>>
>> A more fancy one might be to allow updating only if the POM is newer
>> by comparing times, but that doesn't necessarily cover all fields,  
>> and
>> I'd still want it as an option to enable vs. always updating or never
>> updating a suggested here.
>>
>> Would be a great change!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Brett
>
>
> ______________________
> Este mensaje, y en su caso, cualquier fichero anexo al mismo,
> puede contener informacion clasificada por su emisor como confidencial
> en el marco de su Sistema de Gestion de Seguridad de la
> Informacion siendo para uso exclusivo del destinatario, quedando
> prohibida su divulgacion copia o distribucion a terceros sin la
> autorizacion expresa del remitente. Si Vd. ha recibido este mensaje
> erroneamente, se ruega lo notifique al remitente y proceda a su  
> borrado.
> Gracias por su colaboracion.
> ______________________
> This message including any attachments may contain confidential
> information, according to our Information Security Management System,
> and intended solely for a specific individual to whom they are  
> addressed.
> Any unauthorised copy, disclosure or distribution of this message
> is strictly forbidden. If you have received this transmission in  
> error,
> please notify the sender immediately and delete it.
> ______________________


Mime
View raw message