Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48896 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2009 01:30:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Mar 2009 01:30:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 67435 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2009 01:30:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 67397 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2009 01:30:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 67386 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2009 01:30:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:30:42 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of marica.tan@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.178] (HELO mail-bw0-f178.google.com) (209.85.218.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:30:33 +0000 Received: by bwz26 with SMTP id 26so762701bwz.2 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:30:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=EpHelUJw6SPk6zjOM7EU/+2qp/Egf2SnWPzfnuO74dM=; b=jlHCZD/OTIXq0qRnrEbCrY7gBHOmf1pJLP7Xj5EbBtBpZn+zJQ43aP5zOx/1ox/2+p JBxmK7wODE5nY8FZ6v7V+JMw0v1RzD4F51TwvA8bgSlmt7Dog/+xStZUhsI45s8n7t/J TLHoTt7Qj8tXYqnOe72+uOBne8j4EA3ovByMk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=OCBVMnJCvRMBfgJy32XPbaTzOfQV/SHe0/CLQG0nCb9MTaOKYVWW/+m4fvC21GIs7m /dOfRvmXslcQsjfEK7LUkzLJKoizl9kKPBljR8kRiuyz0Omye6ajXITkOcPsPESL+SvQ oiCGEZ32Qd9BbBZmGdFTCQEiWYkO+QdZfE55Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.100.70 with SMTP id x6mr1043275bkn.140.1237512612267; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:30:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <71263901-974A-4C11-9784-2CF84119EFE2@apache.org> References: <71263901-974A-4C11-9784-2CF84119EFE2@apache.org> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:30:12 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Some continuum objects are not backed up From: Marica Tan To: dev@continuum.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f0a01ea8c691046582db04 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f0a01ea8c691046582db04 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit No. I think it needs to be backed up too. On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Brett Porter wrote: > Yes, that just seems like an omission from the root element. > > Does leaving out ContinuumReleaseResult keep a consistent database? I > assume the build results are backed up. > > - Brett > > > On 20/03/2009, at 11:39 AM, Marica Tan wrote: > > Hi, >> >> When i tried to backed up the builds database, I noticed that some >> continuum >> objects were not backed up. >> >> - BuildDefinitionTemplate >> - ContinuumReleaseResult >> >> Should the BuildDefinitionTemplate be included when you back up the builds >> database? >> >> >> Thanks >> -- >> Marica >> > > -- > Brett Porter > brett@apache.org > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > > --001485f0a01ea8c691046582db04--