Mailing-List: contact dev-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@continuum.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wsmoak@gmail.com designates
 74.125.46.156 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=jocG8vJemHKKkZX3f/iUUwaV4vH9rrhV+ZdFRr8pCSgeWkOt3ap5w3ZgxoLtwzowct
         bH1TkHk8Jf8+isFq332MoS+v6zmMZB+norEuJXfL4+Uq60FnRvjfNflJzHnnt4S9mQwW
         84AUI8jujD4UWb/ZuE5GNkmoJzha87/Vs/vhQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e33f3ae10902011827s7df94471ref62026096bfc8ad@mail.gmail.com>
References: <10c62ca80901271621n792d7eb4scb2f780e7ebec907@mail.gmail.com>
	 <D06232FC-568D-4511-8987-6AFC99621328@apache.org>
	 <10c62ca80902011644k7a9302anaae98b81bcfad7b7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <e33f3ae10902011827s7df94471ref62026096bfc8ad@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:01:11 -0700
Message-ID: <adba96190902052001wc012f9cp3c23e8b4c3df906b@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Missing Functionalities in Distributed Builds
From: Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com>
To: dev@continuum.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Jan Ancajas <jansquared@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 4. Agent group
>>>> 5. Selection of agent
>>>>
>>> is this grouping by some classification? Like "Windows"?
>>>
>> We can have the user select which agent to add in a group and have that
>> group attached to a build environment? So instead of agent attached to a
>> build environment, it will be group of agents.
>>
> Sounds good to me..  I'll take a stab on 4 & 5 and see what I can contribute..:)

What did you have in mind for this?  We had some other conversations
about how groups and selection should work, for example that an
administrator has to be in control of where a project is allowed to
build, and some thoughts about whether to require explicit
configuration of agents into groups, or whether it would be capability
based and more automatic.

-- 
Wendy