Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-7833-apmail-continuum-dev-archive=continuum.apache.org@continuum.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 88532 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2009 11:53:04 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Feb 2009 11:53:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 48377 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2009 11:53:04 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@continuum.apache.org
Received: (qmail 48338 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2009 11:53:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@continuum.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@continuum.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@continuum.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.continuum.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@continuum.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@continuum.apache.org
Received: (qmail 48322 invoked by uid 99); 14 Feb 2009 11:53:04 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 03:53:04 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [209.85.198.243] (HELO rv-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.198.243)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 11:52:54 +0000
Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id k29so985050rvb.50
        for <dev@continuum.apache.org>; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 03:52:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.141.82.20 with SMTP id j20mr520003rvl.54.1234612352892;
        Sat, 14 Feb 2009 03:52:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.241.220? ([122.55.80.194])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g14sm698023rvb.0.2009.02.14.03.52.31
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Sat, 14 Feb 2009 03:52:32 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Brett Porter <brett@porterclan.net>
Message-Id: <743E90D9-1950-4C89-A4B0-B9FBE4B76652@apache.org>
From: Brett Porter <brett@apache.org>
To: dev@continuum.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <adba96190902110914x7891fa31uf55ce721f164adb8@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Re: Releasing 1.2.x for data management
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:52:27 +0800
References: <adba96190902110914x7891fa31uf55ce721f164adb8@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org



On 12/02/2009, at 1:14 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:

> Because of a bug, we're advising people not to use data management in
> 1.2.2 or 1.2.3, and instead to build the 1.2.4-SNAPSHOT jar.
>
> I went looking to see what had been changed after 1.2.3, and JIRA
> shows nothing in the 1.2.4 release notes:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=14891&styleName=Text&projectId=10540&Create=Create

I think that was my bad, I cheated.

>
>
> I'll track down the change that was made to fix data management and
> get an issue in there.
>
> Since it seems no other changes have been made, I was thinking of
> releasing _just_ the Data Management bits as 1.2.3.1 instead of doing
> the entire thing.
>
> To do this, I would change the <parent> in data-managment/pom.xml to
> 1.2.3, update its version to 1.2.3.1-SNAPSHOT, and release from the
> data-management directory.  After the release, change it all back to
> 1.2.4-SNAPSHOT.
>
> Thoughts?

+1

>
>
> -- 
> Wendy

--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/