Mailing-List: contact dev-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@continuum.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.182.184 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:references;
        b=u946sxgpH/YtfCkTpUaeRLb2b30olRQwhwaGqJbn5Yv8fV2r/E1BuWO8EzUQzpSa6I
         x4D1DwT/S012pP0OXjvvKZL/+a4is8pjkDvLr2a6XU7d+6OhJ2jxN9QvF/fUV04erHiD
         oT+IwhKeokLz90Vjn/NJ/GU7nLEQtlxvDDkAQ=
Message-ID: <f345f3480809040659w5f0777ebs573bb5837964e8b1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 15:59:21 +0200
From: "Emmanuel Venisse" <emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com>
To: dev@continuum.apache.org
Subject: Re: Working with notifiers
In-Reply-To: <adba96190809040644t2bcc17cblfaf033cf89999a49@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_30057_18084228.1220536761165"
References: <adba96190809031551l76c050bdj5e163c5beb82f1bc@mail.gmail.com>
	 <9948cb690809040038l6f07cc99nea3ec816e0700b0@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f345f3480809040057h5d11db03s951109d85f2adc15@mail.gmail.com>
	 <adba96190809040644t2bcc17cblfaf033cf89999a49@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_30057_18084228.1220536761165
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Yes, it will be better to move it.We don't have history about it, it is
there since the begin of continuum dev, "all" was in continuum-core

Emmanuel

On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com> wrote:

> Can the mail notifier be pulled out to a separate jar prior to
> introducing a plugin architecture, or should I not even try?
>
> I'm looking for the reason why things are the way they are now-- most
> notifiers over in continuum-notifiers, but the email one still in
> continuum-core.
>
> If it's just that no one wanted to move it yet, I'll try, but I
> suspect there's more history around this.
>
> To solve my immediate problem I don't think I need an architecture
> change in Continuum.  It's just that replacing one small notifier jar
> would be easier and safer than messing around with the continuum-core
> jar.  And it probably leads us in the right direction anyway, where
> each plugin is a separate jar.
>
> --
> Wendy
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:57 AM, Emmanuel Venisse
> <emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Me too, but we must introduce a plugins architecture in Continuum before
> to
> > write an archetype.
> > Emmanuel
>

------=_Part_30057_18084228.1220536761165--