continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Emmanuel Venisse" <emmanuel.veni...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: which jpa branch is active?
Date Fri, 12 Sep 2008 04:24:05 GMT
We can't use LGPL in Apache products we deliver for third party libraries,
it isn't allowed.

You can look the following links for more informations about licenses:

http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#criteriaandcategories

Emmanuel

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Ken Liu <ken.liu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the info.
>
> I read an old email thread (from the 2.0 planning earlier this year)
> discussing which JPA provider to use. Was there ever a consensus reached on
> this?
>
> I think Hibernate is probably the most commonly used JPA provider (I use it
> in my workplace as well), but there was mention of TopLink Essentials.
> Someone mentioned something about the Hibernate license (LGPL 2.1) not
> being
> compatible with Apache licensing?
>
> Ken
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Emmanuel Venisse <
> emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Both was "test" branches. If you want to look at one, I'd prefer you look
> > at
> > mine (continuum-jpa-evenisse) ;-)
> > My branch was based on jpa annotations and the other one was done with
> sql
> > in the code. I think annotations are better but I'm not a JPA expert.
> >
> > We don't have for the moment a real development on JPA but it is
> something
> > I'd like in a future version.
> >
> > Now in trunk, the store is split to few DAO. If you want to propose
> > something, I think it would be better to start from scratch on trunk by
> > rewriting the continuum-store module. Maybe some other parts will be
> > impacted.
> >
> > Emmanuel
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Ken Liu <ken.liu@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am interested in contributing to the JPA refactoring effort as I have
> > JPA
> > > expertise. I saw that there are two jpa branches (continuum-jpa and
> > > continuum-jpa-evenisse). Are both of these branches under development?
> > Are
> > > they both considered to be candidates for merging into the trunk?
> > >
> > > Any background information on these would be appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Ken
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message