continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Emmanuel Venisse" <emmanuel.veni...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Continuum 1.2 and SQL Server
Date Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:30:58 GMT
The size (8000) is already define for mssql:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/continuum/trunk/continuum-model/src/main/resources/package-mssql.orm

Emmanuel

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org> wrote:

> arghhhh :-)))
>
> It's due to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1688.
>
> We can certainly reduce the size to 8000.
> I will reopen the issue.
> IMHO, we should control it and why not reduce the String if it's too long
>
> --
> Olivier
> PS : olamy complains about database vendor restriction ;-)
>
> 2008/9/10 Brett Porter <brett@apache.org>:
> > Sorry for finding more issues :) Since this one is a regression I thought
> it
> > might require some attention.
> >
> > I saw on the users@ list that someone had a problem using SQL Server
> because
> > of the length of changeComment being increased to 8192 (> 8000). I think
> > this was previously shorter - is that right?
> >
> > If so, should it be reduced by this small amount?
> >
> > I'm still getting to test the database upgrade... once done and
> documented
> > I'm happy with the release.
> >
> > - Brett
> >
> > --
> > Brett Porter
> > brett@apache.org
> > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message