continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Olivier Lamy" <ol...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Continuum 1.2 and SQL Server
Date Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:37:26 GMT
Great.
But why it doesn't work and how to enable this ?

Sorry I don't have a mssql server here ;-)

--
Olivier

2008/9/10 Emmanuel Venisse <emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com>:
> The size (8000) is already define for mssql:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/continuum/trunk/continuum-model/src/main/resources/package-mssql.orm
>
> Emmanuel
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> arghhhh :-)))
>>
>> It's due to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1688.
>>
>> We can certainly reduce the size to 8000.
>> I will reopen the issue.
>> IMHO, we should control it and why not reduce the String if it's too long
>>
>> --
>> Olivier
>> PS : olamy complains about database vendor restriction ;-)
>>
>> 2008/9/10 Brett Porter <brett@apache.org>:
>> > Sorry for finding more issues :) Since this one is a regression I thought
>> it
>> > might require some attention.
>> >
>> > I saw on the users@ list that someone had a problem using SQL Server
>> because
>> > of the length of changeComment being increased to 8192 (> 8000). I think
>> > this was previously shorter - is that right?
>> >
>> > If so, should it be reduced by this small amount?
>> >
>> > I'm still getting to test the database upgrade... once done and
>> documented
>> > I'm happy with the release.
>> >
>> > - Brett
>> >
>> > --
>> > Brett Porter
>> > brett@apache.org
>> > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>> >
>> >
>>
>

Mime
View raw message