continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Olivier Lamy" <ol...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Continuum 1.2 and SQL Server
Date Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:04:44 GMT
arghhhh :-)))

It's due to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1688.

We can certainly reduce the size to 8000.
I will reopen the issue.
IMHO, we should control it and why not reduce the String if it's too long

--
Olivier
PS : olamy complains about database vendor restriction ;-)

2008/9/10 Brett Porter <brett@apache.org>:
> Sorry for finding more issues :) Since this one is a regression I thought it
> might require some attention.
>
> I saw on the users@ list that someone had a problem using SQL Server because
> of the length of changeComment being increased to 8192 (> 8000). I think
> this was previously shorter - is that right?
>
> If so, should it be reduced by this small amount?
>
> I'm still getting to test the database upgrade... once done and documented
> I'm happy with the release.
>
> - Brett
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>

Mime
View raw message