continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Maria Odea Ching" <och...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Is the NOTICE file in the Jetty bundle correct?
Date Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:44:02 GMT
I think I can do it this weekend (unless someone else wants to) :)

-Deng

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 (Do you have some time to do it ? ).
>
> --
> Olivier
>
> 2008/9/2 Maria Odea Ching <oching@apache.org>:
> > In archiva-jetty, I added a supplements file for the undetermined jars
> > listed in it's NOTICE file and I also configured in the assembly
> descriptor
> > to overwrite the LICENSE file included by the remote resources plugin
> with a
> > custom one (ASF license with wrapper license appended). Perharps we
> should
> > do the same in continuum-jetty?
> >
> > -Deng
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:
> >> > I believe that's correct - from memory, the others don't have a notice
> >> > requirement. It would be more valuable to incorporate them though, and
> it
> >> > should be checked.
> >> >
> >> > What does need to be confirmed is the LICENSE file, which should
> include
> >> the
> >> > JSW 3.2.3 license, for example.
> >>
> >> In the Jetty bundle, LICENSE only contains the Apache License 2.0.
> >>
> >> The NOTICE file in the webapp is the same, it only lists the ASF, yet
> >> there are lots of non-ASF jars WEB-INF/lib.
> >>
> >> I think we're depending on the remote resources plugin here, and I'm
> >> not sure it's doing the right thing.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Wendy
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message