Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40538 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2008 14:37:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Aug 2008 14:37:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 19991 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2008 14:37:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 19887 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2008 14:37:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 19876 invoked by uid 99); 29 Aug 2008 14:37:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:37:51 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wsmoak@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.16 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.16] (HELO mail-gx0-f16.google.com) (209.85.217.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:36:54 +0000 Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so5306031gxk.2 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:37:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=gc8ga9jbtVtwVkARtSoITR2ttIYq9KArOOv1em5hZhA=; b=oKyg91uulUNePLbz4riKtPucp4QbJz5EO9uLWt7T4uQaBPyZSD/7Y6geAjHZJsBiR+ 0nqzyTkRjMk5tw+QVci2SljV4K1TreVLjqLt/BLRMNdU9DCRIUdcy6iXL8Rw/ovPS4wa FCN4yFdYQt6T4LpNAmrpeK3oC/lQWzwlbEs8k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=DxVYmWJuiuwcXGcjwLAbA9M/ktvji4ecVzfh6dinWruiuHABF6LAKeiIu+DqpYGuUq SXeT3r2lAmbHJSaHCHgegxFNuORJrmSSVgDGmEI0G5vNQIz4EZmvujLzX5MFKByTbiaF 6F5v/MW4gVcwDfWXM9XC2una4LMnWVh8QU+7w= Received: by 10.151.14.5 with SMTP id r5mr4315536ybi.70.1220020643843; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:37:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.138.5 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:37:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:37:23 -0700 From: "Wendy Smoak" To: dev@continuum.apache.org Subject: Re: Continuum 1.2 this month? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <9948cb690808101521g43d575n542f1c7981aa5f73@mail.gmail.com> <9948cb690808212248u2de87d8bv1f550302221b9f76@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: >> So, branch for 1.2.x and change trunk to 1.3 ? > > ok. >> I'm not sure how extensive the changes in Redback are, but I'm >> concerned about switching from 1.0 to 1.1 this late in the game. > > When do you want to start the release? Today, barring anything blocking that I don't know about. > I'll can finish my changes for Monday evening. > If you can wait until it, it would be cool, otherwise it will go in 1.2.1 > with redback 1.0.3 I think that would be best. (Though I'm a bit confused about the versions-- your changes are in Redback 1.1-SNAPSHOT now, are they going to be merged to Redback 1.0.x for a release?) In general, will Continuum 1.2.x stay with Redback 1.0.x? I'm not sure what the version number on trunk should be if I branch for 1.2.0. But we can sort that out later I guess. -- Wendy