continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Wendy Smoak" <>
Subject Re: Continuum release versioning
Date Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:23:57 GMT
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Wendy Smoak <> wrote:

> Then I'm going to prepare Continuum 1.2.0.

Olivier volunteered for this. :)  We had a brief discussion on irc
about 1.2 vs 1.2.0 ... either works for me.

I did want to write a bit more about this style of release versioning
(or just paste what I wrote on irc) to see if there are any thoughts
or comments.

With http-style versioning, you end up with tags like this... (or my preference is
to keep all of them, even if it doesn't go public, like this .)

When we vote, we can decide what label to put on it... milestone,
alpha, beta, GA ... or none, and it doesn't go in the filename.  If
the vote doesn't pass, we move on to the next one-- it's okay to skip

So if we release 1.2.0 as beta, and then decide that there's nothing
wrong with it, we can promote it to GA without going through another
release process.  We simply vote again, and change the text on the
download web page.

If we don't attach a label to it in the announcement/on the download
page, people will assume it's GA, ready for production use.

The first one in the series doesn't have to be feature complete.  If
we decide it's a milestone or an alpha, we can still make changes in a
dot release after that.

It all comes down to... it's just a version number, and it means
exactly what we say it means, no more, no less.


View raw message