continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Olivier Lamy" <ol...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Branching for local repository related changes
Date Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:39:13 GMT
I have committed the patch in the branch.
I have changed the application.xml in the webapp to handle two new
fields in an object.
And I can start with a 1.1 db.
I will try this with a copy of my production company continuum
database which is more huge.

--
Olivier

2008/7/24 Emmanuel Venisse <emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> 2008/7/24 Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com>:
>> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> FYI, I'm planning to create a branch to apply and review Marica's work
>> >> on CONTINUUM-782 (local repository purging) and related issues --
>> >> separate local repos per group, etc.
>> >>
>> >> It looks like CONTINUUM-1759 (ability to delete working copies
>> >> associated with releases) was combined with 782, though I don't
>> >> immediately see how it's related.
>> >
>> > I was waiting for Marica's iCLA to be recorded, which has now
>> > happened.  However, I'm booked for the next week, so if anyone else
>> > wants to review and commit this, feel free.  I won't get back to it
>> > until next Wednesday at the earliest.
>>
>> I can work on this in a dedicated branch. I have a first (small) look
>> at the patch and I have seen model change. If we can not have this (or
>> having a upgrade tool ;-) ).
>>
>
> For 1.2, I'd prefer to not change the db schema.
>
> Emmanuel
>
>
>>
>> >
>> > I like it. :)  A branch may not be necessary unless someone else sees
>> > something that needs more work or discussion.
>> >
>> > One slight concern I have is that it introduces a dependency on an
>> > Archiva jar.  It was a snapshot dependency, but Archiva just released
>> > 1.1 so that's no longer a problem.  But is this something that Archiva
>> > intends for re-use, or just something internal to it?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Wendy
>> >
>>
>

Mime
View raw message