Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 97318 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2008 13:35:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jun 2008 13:35:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 73901 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2008 13:35:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-continuum-dev-archive@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 73746 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2008 13:35:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@continuum.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@continuum.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@continuum.apache.org Received: (qmail 73734 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2008 13:35:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 06:35:16 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.55.235.182] (HELO mvdb.net) (69.55.235.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:34:26 +0000 Received: (qmail 15689 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2008 13:34:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [10.0.0.26]) (80.101.99.154) by 69.55.235.171 with SMTP; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:34:42 +0000 Message-ID: <4852773C.5030009@mvdb.net> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:33:48 +0200 From: Martin van den Bemt User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20080430) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@continuum.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r667235 - /continuum/trunk/pom.xml References: <20080612213043.956542388A08@eris.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <20080612213043.956542388A08@eris.apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This is a mail coming a bit out of the blue probably, since I haven't been really publicly active yet on continuum. Can we please not depend on SNAPSHOT's anymore that are outside of the continuum project ? This makes continuum highly unstable and makes maintenance way too hard if you also have to start monitoring the external snapshots. Continuum is not the place to test a bug fix in plexus-utils I think (if that is what happened, didn't check the plexus-utils changes). Mvgr, Martin olamy@apache.org wrote: > Author: olamy > Date: Thu Jun 12 14:30:43 2008 > New Revision: 667235 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=667235&view=rev > Log: > upgrade to last p-u SNAPSHOT to test fix for CONTINUUM-1360 (semicolon in svn args) > > > > Modified: > continuum/trunk/pom.xml > > Modified: continuum/trunk/pom.xml > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/continuum/trunk/pom.xml?rev=667235&r1=667234&r2=667235&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- continuum/trunk/pom.xml (original) > +++ continuum/trunk/pom.xml Thu Jun 12 14:30:43 2008 > @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ > > org.codehaus.plexus > plexus-utils > - 1.5.1 > + 1.5.2-SNAPSHOT > > > org.codehaus.plexus > > > >