continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <>
Subject Re: need comments on CONTINUUM-1719
Date Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:52:56 GMT
This seems to make sense to me. Though I'd also be happy with  
selecting one solution and deprecating the xmlrpc.

I've been thinking here about a proposal for separating the builder of  
Continuum out from the web interface to clean up the design a bit, and  
even being able to run it independently. I think a REST interface to  
the build information makes a lot of sense (and properly secured,  
could make a good remote trigger for an SCM hook, etc).

I'll try and get this out to the list tomorrow.

- Brett

On 08/04/2008, at 8:17 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:

> Hi,
> I have loaded an issue (improvment CONTINUUM-1719) to refactoring the
> xmlrpc part in order to have a more generic remote access solution.
> Comments are welcome.
> Thanks,
> --
> Olivier

Brett Porter

View raw message