continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Olivier Lamy" <ol...@apache.org>
Subject Re: changes in JIRA
Date Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:51:55 GMT
2008/4/2, Emmanuel Venisse <emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:
>
>  > Ok, I'm done :)
>  >
>  > The good news: I closed over 100 out of date/duplicate issues.
>  >
>  > The bad news: the number of fixes for 1.2 went from 25 to 113. Some of
>  > these are things I want that I'm hoping to take a stab at, some have
>  > patches, some just need a quick review. We could probably get that down
>  > pretty quickly with a few volunteers :) But if not, many could easily be cut
>  > to 1.3. But it seems a lot easier to find things now.

Thanks ! Brett.

>
>
>
> I'll look at them.
>
>
>
>  >
>  > 1.x are things I consider to still be real issues and feature requests
>  > that we should look to slot in to future versions.
>  >
>  > I was thinking that each release could be associated with one
>  > architectural change on the way to 2.0 (1.2 introduces Spring, 1.3 JPA, 1.4
>  > workflow). And along the way we kill off the annoyances and bugs first and
>  > focus on continuing to make Continuum bullet proof and easy to use.
>
>
>
> it was exactly my discussion with Olivier yesterday :)

Nice :-)

>
>
>
>  >
>  >
>  > Any thoughts on things that might be mis-assigned?
>  >
>  > HTH,
>  > Brett
>  >
>  >
>  > On 02/04/2008, at 8:37 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>  >
>  >  Hi folks,
>  > >
>  > > I went on a bit of a cleanup mission as I wanted to get a few things
>  > > into 1.2. My intent was to take care of the things that have been the
>  > > biggest pain-points on vmbuild, and am looking to work on a few myself. I
>  > > knew most of them were already filed, and I wanted to cleanup the 300+
>  > > issues in Future/Unscheduled. I also added the "low hanging fruit" to 1.2
>  > > (patches, NPEs, things that just need verification). It ended up quite a
>  > > long list (and I'm still going). I may push some out again afterwards.
>  > >
>  > > Hopefully I've cleaned out a decent amount of old issues. 1.x should now
>  > > be the things that can feasibly fixed/added, Future is beyond 2.0.
>  > >
>  > > I wanted to suggest we set a month attempt at these issues, and push out
>  > > anything not done in that time. WDYT?
>  > >
>  > > Sorry for the issues@ SPAM :)
>  > >
>  > > Cheers,
>  > > Brett
>  > >
>  > > --
>  > > Brett Porter
>  > > brett@apache.org
>  > > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>  > >
>  > >
>  > --
>  > Brett Porter
>  > brett@apache.org
>  > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>  >
>  >
>

Mime
View raw message