continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Confused about the branches
Date Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:31:55 GMT

On 05/03/2008, at 5:18 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:

> 2008/3/4, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org>:
>>
>> On 04/03/2008, at 10:47 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>
>>> Agree on this.
>>> Currently there is a blocking issue with xml-rpc CONTINUUM-1590  
>>> which
>>> prevent using xml-rpc :-(.
>>
>>
>> Cool - shall we just start using the 1.2 bucket in JIRA? There are
>> only 14 issues there now so maybe we could keep that to 20-30 issues
>> all together and release it.
>
> +1

ok, I'll get my stuff in there

>
>
>>
>> I found these changes on trunk that are not on the branch: r617400.
>> (The rest is documentation)
>>
>> I found these changes on the branch that are not on trunk: r627196,
>> r620613, r620612, r620611
>>
>> I think we should just merge all those from the branch to trunk, set
>> it as v1.2, and close the branch for now?
>
> +1. (Perso, I don't really like the idea of starting a parrallel
> branch/trunk "a la" mvn 2.1 :-) )

I'll merge the changes to trunk - but will wait to hear other's  
opinions on this too before changing the branch

>
>
>>
>>
>>> If no objections, I will change root pom to not have anymore maven  
>>> pom
>>> as parent.
>>
>>
>> Sounds good - do you think we should have a Continuum parent POM like
>> we do for Archiva?
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/continuum/parent/trunk ?
> A new pom without parent ? (I can certainly copy some contents from
> the maven parent pom)

With an ASF parent instead of the Maven one, yep.

>
>
> Question : do we have to change the groupId in the poms :
> org.apache.maven.continuum -> org.apache.continuum ( java package too
> ? looks a big bang)

I don't see any downside to doing this :)

- Brett

--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/


Mime
View raw message