Mailing-List: contact continuum-dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of elpunzalan@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.166.177 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=jXCr7cnGkJViSMfNYc7UK+DRDBT4IYgqRO72Rj94NVrDSui5j1ALR/dBJHfqcjbal4REQz4lJxOIbpDancstMnM54guT34CyvhD3c8n70wLzW3jG88X57vAzlAB6OnZdal2EifCD/SjAmj9IvIKN+78wNc2Ci7BFHfAWlxc/k1w=
Message-ID: <958977410802061752kd0aa78eya96e9cecb66efd0a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:52:05 -0800
From: "Edwin Punzalan" <epunzalan@apache.org>
Sender: elpunzalan@gmail.com
To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap
In-Reply-To: <f345f3480801291434y232263d3q2257fa0fcfd82679@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_4730_18871369.1202349125432"
References: <f345f3480801291434y232263d3q2257fa0fcfd82679@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_4730_18871369.1202349125432
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I can only agree on the pointers given in the wiki.  However, I'd like to
reiterate the low significance of database portability in a CI server.  I
think speed matters but not really portability.

Andy seems to be willing to help solve the database problems Continuum is
experiencing.

Just my 2 cents, though.  ^_^

On Jan 29, 2008 2:34 PM, Emmanuel Venisse <emmanuel@venisse.net> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I started a document [1] with my ideas about Continuum 2.
> As you can see in this doc, I want to add lot of things in the next
> version.
>
> Feel free to comment on it.
>
>
> [1]
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUM/Continuum+2.0+Design+Discussion
>
> Emmanuel
>

------=_Part_4730_18871369.1202349125432--