continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Napoleon Esmundo C. Ramirez" <napoleonesmundocarpiorami...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap
Date Wed, 06 Feb 2008 02:20:32 GMT
Just some thoughts,

I strongly agree to the proposed technology changes, particularly in the
database, as it will definitely improve the storage performance.  In line
with the objectives to make Continuum a slick CI server, I think the design
changes is a good move as well.  In my opinion, having plugins will provide
a platform for flexibility and a workflow-type of approach in managing the
builds.

My proposed features would be the following:
1.  Aside from the improvement in the UI, I think a visual representation of
statistics would be nice.  Graphs of the success rates, charts of project
health, etc.  I think Bamboo has it as telemetry.
2.  Distributed builds, this has been started before but it was never used.
I think this would be a strong point in using Continuum if it were
available.  Hudson has it, iirc.  I think implementing it as a plugin would
provide more control to it.

Again, just my thoughts.

Cheers!
Nap

On Feb 6, 2008 8:12 AM, Carlos Sanchez <carlos@apache.org> wrote:

> Some comments
>
> Database vs xml: definitely database. Throwing away the db access api
> (JDO/JPA/...) now that it's already there doesnt make much sense.
> Maybe there are implementations that use xml for storage and that's
> where you'd need to look if you want file storage
>
> Spring vs Guice vs Plexus: Spring for sure. Big community, lots of
> users, documentation, support,... Specially if you want to add JMX
> support (can be done really easily just with annotations using
> reflection), and thinking in OSGi in the future I'm sure it will be
> really easy to integrate Spring and OSGi if it is not already. I'd
> start softly, just migrating thing that would require adding features
> to plexus, and move from there.
>
> I agree with Brett on having 1.2, 1.3,... it's good to have a list of
> what you want to do for 2.0 but as it gets done it should be released
> in minor versions.
>
> On Jan 29, 2008 2:34 PM, Emmanuel Venisse <emmanuel@venisse.net> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I started a document [1] with my ideas about Continuum 2.
> > As you can see in this doc, I want to add lot of things in the next
> version.
> >
> > Feel free to comment on it.
> >
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUM/Continuum+2.0+Design+Discussion
> >
> > Emmanuel
> >
>
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
>                             -- The Princess Bride
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message