continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jesse McConnell" <jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP
Date Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:49:22 GMT
hehe, I am honored to be mentioned

I would second brett's nomination of evenisse as chair, can't think of
anyone that has given more to the project in the last couple of years :)

jesse

On Jan 7, 2008 3:00 PM, Rahul Thakur <rahul.thakur.xdev3@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> And the nominations are.....
>
> (~opens the envelope~)
>
> 1)  Brett Porter
>
> , and
>
> 2)  Jesse McConnell
>
> Cheers :-)
> Rahul
>
>
>
> Brett Porter wrote:
> > of course :)
> >
> > On 07/01/2008, at 5:09 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Are more than one nominations allowed per person?
> >>
> >> Rahul
> >>
> >> Brett Porter wrote:
> >>> So the poll for progressing seems in favour.
> >>>
> >>> Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the board, we
> >>> need to decide on a description for the project, the initial
> >>> PMC/committers, and a chair.
> >>>
> >>> I would like to nominate Emmanuel as the chair of the project. Are
> >>> there any other nominations?
> >>>
> >>> I have the current committers list as:
> >>> Maria Odea Ching
> >>> Joakim Erdfelt
> >>> Olivier Lamy
> >>> Trygve Laugstol
> >>> Jesse McConnell
> >>> Brett Porter
> >>> Edwin Punzalan
> >>> Carlos Sanchez
> >>> Wendy Smoak
> >>> Rahul Thakur
> >>> Emmanuel Venisse
> >>> Kenney Westerhof
> >>> Andrew Williams
> >>>
> >>> Anyone on that list that doesn't feel they should be a committer?
> >>> Did I miss anyone?
> >>>
> >>> The following have committed only once, or have declared themselves
> >>> emeritus:
> >>> Herve Boutemy
> >>> Dan Diephouse
> >>> Fabrizio Giustina
> >>> Arnaud Heritier
> >>> Lukas Theussl
> >>> Jason van Zyl
> >>>
> >>> Anyone on that list that would like to be included?
> >>>
> >>> Finally - I propose that the initial PMC be equal to the list of
> >>> committers. Any objections or opinions about that?
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Brett
> >>>
> >>> On 20/12/2007, at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> So, what's next?
> >>>>
> >>>> This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get
> >>>> started on it?
> >>>>
> >>>> From past experience the steps would be:
> >>>> - poll the current maven committers to see who is interested in
> >>>> participating in the TLP
> >>>> - draft a resolution with those committers as the initial PMC
> >>>> - vote on sending the resolution to the board
> >>>>
> >>>> The board next meets in mid-January.
> >>>>
> >>>> Any thoughts on moving forward with this?
> >>>>
> >>>> - Brett
> >>>>
> >>>> On 24/09/2007, at 6:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse <emmanuel@venisse.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top Level
> >>>>>> Project at ASF and the continuum community will have more chance
> >>>>>> to grow.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer
from
> >>>>>> different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers from
> >>>>>> different companies would be good.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It definitely feels like it's time for this to happen, or at least
> to
> >>>>> start the process.  Assuming there is general agreement here, let's
> >>>>> talk about it on dev@maven and see who else might be interested
in
> >>>>> joining us in a TLP.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IMO, anyone who has access to the code now as part of Maven is
> >>>>> welcome
> >>>>> to come along when it moves out, or at any point in the future.
> >>>>> That's how we handled the Tiles move (from Struts) and it worked
> >>>>> well.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Wendy
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message