continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Emmanuel Venisse" <emmanuel.veni...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap
Date Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:11:14 GMT
On Jan 31, 2008 11:05 PM, Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com> wrote:

> >
> > >
> > > 1-2)    I would like to bring Guice to the mix. I think it is worth
> > > investigating for Continuum 2.0 - WDYT?
> >
> >
> > I don't think. I don't see the interest to look at it for Continuum. We
> > already use Plexus that works fine, and  if we decide to move to
> something
> > else,  it should be  for the interest of the project  and features we
> > don't
> > have in Continuum. But maybe you have some arguments about Guice.
> >
> >
> my only comment here is that last I heard plexus was merging with Pico I
> think and going into apache as Apache Composer...so while plexus does
> everything continuum needs now, there is like a container update/upgrade
> somewhere in our future :)
>

Agree, we won't change if we don't need it.

I'm thinking to Spring because it have lot of good features like transaction
support, remote object instead of EJB... and Plexus/Pico don't have them

Emmanuel

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message