continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP
Date Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:50:27 GMT
Thanks Rahul.

I appreciate the thought, however I decline the nomination at this  
time :)

On 08/01/2008, at 5:00 AM, Rahul Thakur wrote:

>
> And the nominations are.....
>
> (~opens the envelope~)
>
> 1)  Brett Porter
>
> , and
>
> 2)  Jesse McConnell
>
> Cheers :-)
> Rahul
>
>
>
> Brett Porter wrote:
>> of course :)
>>
>> On 07/01/2008, at 5:09 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Are more than one nominations allowed per person?
>>>
>>> Rahul
>>>
>>> Brett Porter wrote:
>>>> So the poll for progressing seems in favour.
>>>>
>>>> Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the board, we  
>>>> need to decide on a description for the project, the initial PMC/ 
>>>> committers, and a chair.
>>>>
>>>> I would like to nominate Emmanuel as the chair of the project.  
>>>> Are there any other nominations?
>>>>
>>>> I have the current committers list as:
>>>> Maria Odea Ching
>>>> Joakim Erdfelt
>>>> Olivier Lamy
>>>> Trygve Laugstol
>>>> Jesse McConnell
>>>> Brett Porter
>>>> Edwin Punzalan
>>>> Carlos Sanchez
>>>> Wendy Smoak
>>>> Rahul Thakur
>>>> Emmanuel Venisse
>>>> Kenney Westerhof
>>>> Andrew Williams
>>>>
>>>> Anyone on that list that doesn't feel they should be a committer?  
>>>> Did I miss anyone?
>>>>
>>>> The following have committed only once, or have declared  
>>>> themselves emeritus:
>>>> Herve Boutemy
>>>> Dan Diephouse
>>>> Fabrizio Giustina
>>>> Arnaud Heritier
>>>> Lukas Theussl
>>>> Jason van Zyl
>>>>
>>>> Anyone on that list that would like to be included?
>>>>
>>>> Finally - I propose that the initial PMC be equal to the list of  
>>>> committers. Any objections or opinions about that?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Brett
>>>>
>>>> On 20/12/2007, at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So, what's next?
>>>>>
>>>>> This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get  
>>>>> started on it?
>>>>>
>>>>> From past experience the steps would be:
>>>>> - poll the current maven committers to see who is interested in  
>>>>> participating in the TLP
>>>>> - draft a resolution with those committers as the initial PMC
>>>>> - vote on sending the resolution to the board
>>>>>
>>>>> The board next meets in mid-January.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any thoughts on moving forward with this?
>>>>>
>>>>> - Brett
>>>>>
>>>>> On 24/09/2007, at 6:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse <emmanuel@venisse.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top  
>>>>>>> Level Project at ASF and the continuum community will have  
>>>>>>> more chance to grow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer 

>>>>>>> from different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers
 
>>>>>>> from different companies would be good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It definitely feels like it's time for this to happen, or at  
>>>>>> least to
>>>>>> start the process.  Assuming there is general agreement here,  
>>>>>> let's
>>>>>> talk about it on dev@maven and see who else might be interested 

>>>>>> in
>>>>>> joining us in a TLP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IMO, anyone who has access to the code now as part of Maven is  
>>>>>> welcome
>>>>>> to come along when it moves out, or at any point in the future.
>>>>>> That's how we handled the Tiles move (from Struts) and it  
>>>>>> worked well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Wendy
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message