continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Venisse <emman...@venisse.net>
Subject Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP
Date Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:23:44 GMT
hehe, thanks for the nomination :)

Emmanuel

Jesse McConnell a écrit :
> hehe, I am honored to be mentioned
> 
> I would second brett's nomination of evenisse as chair, can't think of
> anyone that has given more to the project in the last couple of years :)
> 
> jesse
> 
> On Jan 7, 2008 3:00 PM, Rahul Thakur <rahul.thakur.xdev3@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> And the nominations are.....
>>
>> (~opens the envelope~)
>>
>> 1)  Brett Porter
>>
>> , and
>>
>> 2)  Jesse McConnell
>>
>> Cheers :-)
>> Rahul
>>
>>
>>
>> Brett Porter wrote:
>>> of course :)
>>>
>>> On 07/01/2008, at 5:09 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are more than one nominations allowed per person?
>>>>
>>>> Rahul
>>>>
>>>> Brett Porter wrote:
>>>>> So the poll for progressing seems in favour.
>>>>>
>>>>> Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the board, we
>>>>> need to decide on a description for the project, the initial
>>>>> PMC/committers, and a chair.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to nominate Emmanuel as the chair of the project. Are
>>>>> there any other nominations?
>>>>>
>>>>> I have the current committers list as:
>>>>> Maria Odea Ching
>>>>> Joakim Erdfelt
>>>>> Olivier Lamy
>>>>> Trygve Laugstol
>>>>> Jesse McConnell
>>>>> Brett Porter
>>>>> Edwin Punzalan
>>>>> Carlos Sanchez
>>>>> Wendy Smoak
>>>>> Rahul Thakur
>>>>> Emmanuel Venisse
>>>>> Kenney Westerhof
>>>>> Andrew Williams
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone on that list that doesn't feel they should be a committer?
>>>>> Did I miss anyone?
>>>>>
>>>>> The following have committed only once, or have declared themselves
>>>>> emeritus:
>>>>> Herve Boutemy
>>>>> Dan Diephouse
>>>>> Fabrizio Giustina
>>>>> Arnaud Heritier
>>>>> Lukas Theussl
>>>>> Jason van Zyl
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone on that list that would like to be included?
>>>>>
>>>>> Finally - I propose that the initial PMC be equal to the list of
>>>>> committers. Any objections or opinions about that?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Brett
>>>>>
>>>>> On 20/12/2007, at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So, what's next?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get
>>>>>> started on it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From past experience the steps would be:
>>>>>> - poll the current maven committers to see who is interested in
>>>>>> participating in the TLP
>>>>>> - draft a resolution with those committers as the initial PMC
>>>>>> - vote on sending the resolution to the board
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The board next meets in mid-January.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any thoughts on moving forward with this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Brett
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 24/09/2007, at 6:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse <emmanuel@venisse.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top
Level
>>>>>>>> Project at ASF and the continuum community will have more
chance
>>>>>>>> to grow.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer
from
>>>>>>>> different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers
from
>>>>>>>> different companies would be good.
>>>>>>> It definitely feels like it's time for this to happen, or at
least
>> to
>>>>>>> start the process.  Assuming there is general agreement here,
let's
>>>>>>> talk about it on dev@maven and see who else might be interested
in
>>>>>>> joining us in a TLP.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IMO, anyone who has access to the code now as part of Maven is
>>>>>>> welcome
>>>>>>> to come along when it moves out, or at any point in the future.
>>>>>>> That's how we handled the Tiles move (from Struts) and it worked
>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Wendy
>>>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message