continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Venisse <emman...@venisse.net>
Subject Re: "build definition used" on build result
Date Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:30:40 GMT
Brett,
you want to hide it when it is in progress or it is empty too?

If it is empty, it's a bug but I don't want to hide it when the build is started.

Emmanuel

Brett Porter a écrit :
> also when it is in progress
> 
> On 24/09/2007, at 6:50 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> olivier lamy a écrit :
>>> Hi,
>>> * Yes it's stored in the database with the buildResult (like a clone 
>>> and add
>>> of the buildDefinition).
>>> * Yes it is in the email.
>>> * It looks we have to store the buildDefinition even if the scm
>>> update/checkout failed
>>
>> no, if the build fails in checkout/update, the build def must be 
>> hidden in the build result.
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>>> -- 
>>> Olivier
>>> 2007/9/23, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org>:
>>>> A couple of questions/issues on this new feature:
>>>>
>>>> * is this stored with the build result, or is it referring to what is
>>>> in the database now? (ie, what happens to the result if the build
>>>> definition is later removed?)
>>>> * is it in the email template? (haven't looked yet)
>>>> * issue: it shows up on builds that are in error as empty: http://
>>>> maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?
>>>> buildId=23999&projectId=272&projectGroupId=8
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Brett
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Brett Porter - brett@apache.org
>>>> Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
>>>>
>>>>
> 
> -- 
> Brett Porter - brett@apache.org
> Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message