continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: "build definition used" on build result
Date Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:17:56 GMT
It's empty too

On 24/09/2007, at 7:30 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:

> Brett,
> you want to hide it when it is in progress or it is empty too?
>
> If it is empty, it's a bug but I don't want to hide it when the  
> build is started.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Brett Porter a écrit :
>> also when it is in progress
>> On 24/09/2007, at 6:50 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> olivier lamy a écrit :
>>>> Hi,
>>>> * Yes it's stored in the database with the buildResult (like a  
>>>> clone and add
>>>> of the buildDefinition).
>>>> * Yes it is in the email.
>>>> * It looks we have to store the buildDefinition even if the scm
>>>> update/checkout failed
>>>
>>> no, if the build fails in checkout/update, the build def must be  
>>> hidden in the build result.
>>>
>>> Emmanuel
>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Olivier
>>>> 2007/9/23, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org>:
>>>>> A couple of questions/issues on this new feature:
>>>>>
>>>>> * is this stored with the build result, or is it referring to  
>>>>> what is
>>>>> in the database now? (ie, what happens to the result if the build
>>>>> definition is later removed?)
>>>>> * is it in the email template? (haven't looked yet)
>>>>> * issue: it shows up on builds that are in error as empty: http://
>>>>> maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?
>>>>> buildId=23999&projectId=272&projectGroupId=8
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Brett
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Brett Porter - brett@apache.org
>>>>> Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> -- 
>> Brett Porter - brett@apache.org
>> Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/

--
Brett Porter - brett@apache.org
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/

Mime
View raw message