Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89467 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2007 21:40:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 2007 21:40:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 20201 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2007 21:40:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-dev-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 20033 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2007 21:40:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact continuum-dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 20017 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2007 21:40:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:40:44 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [62.193.206.9] (HELO webmail9.amenworld.com) (62.193.206.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 21:40:16 +0000 Received: (qmail 29706 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2007 21:40:19 -0000 Received: from chb28-2-88-163-39-128.fbx.proxad.net (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (88.163.39.128) by 0 with SMTP; 1 Aug 2007 21:40:19 -0000 Message-ID: <46B0FDB0.8000501@venisse.net> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 23:40:00 +0200 From: Emmanuel Venisse User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: Database model change for beta-1 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think null value will be enough. I think we'll need to test the null value in the UI but it isn't a problem. Emmanuel Brett Porter a �crit : > Hi, > > I've narrowed down the problem in upgrading from alpha-2 to beta-1 to > the following model change: > > > buildDefinition > 1.1.0+ > jpox.dependent="false"> > BuildDefinition > > > > > The problem here is that Continuum has no idea how to pre-populate the > value for this. Should we/can we simply add a default value of null for > this? Or will the data management app need some smarts to set it to the > default build definition where it doesn't exist? > > Thanks, > Brett > > > >