Mailing-List: contact continuum-dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <45F518DE.8010805@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:09:50 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?B?VHJ5Z3ZlIExhdWdzdMO4bA==?= <trygvis@apache.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (X11/20070123)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1
References: <a43524d00703070952rbff448bh69a55714f7923dbd@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5757A095-15CD-4808-96E5-DF2F420E1B13@apache.org>
	 <45EF0A13.3090206@venisse.net>
	 <a43524d00703091201y6db4da90v46b1dcedec2c192d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <541f12ca0703091216p2c91db46p4cd3ba74fbd74b27@mail.gmail.com>
 <a43524d00703091222p2ef0b2aw6dadc98ec9876dc4@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a43524d00703091222p2ef0b2aw6dadc98ec9876dc4@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Jesse McConnell wrote:
> sounds good to me, imo either trunc it or maybe switch the model over
> to a clob for that in the db...

I tried to make it a CLOB once but couldn't get it to work because of 
some JPOX issues IIRC so for alpha-1 just chop the exception and/or 
write it to a separate file and put the ideal solution into a later alpha.

Keep moving!

--
Trygve

> jesse
> 
> On 3/9/07, Stephane Nicoll <stephane.nicoll@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 3/9/07, Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I have gone through jira issues there were assigned to 1.1 and spread
>> > things out a bit.
>> >
>> > here is my criteria I used in separating out the issues:
>> >
>> > 1.1-alpha-1 -> issues that need to be addressed asap before we pull
>> > any kinda alpha
>>
>> Not because I opened this but I think CONTINUUM-1194 should be fixed.
>> I'll try to provide a patch this sunday for this. As a summary, if an
>> error occurs and the stacktrace is higher than 8000 chars:
>>
>> * The build is stuck in Build In Progress
>> * No notification is triggered (an error has occured?!)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stéphane
>>
>>
>>
>> > 1.1-alpha-2 -> higher importance issues and ones generally related 
>> to xml-rpc
>> > 1.1-alpha-# -> issues that probably ought to be resolved in the 
>> alpha releases
>> > Future -> stuff that probably ain't going to get done any day soon
>> >
>> > the idea being that we can make new sequential release issues off of
>> > the 1.1-alpha-# release tag until we are done with alpha releases.  I
>> > think once 1.1-alpha-1 is released then we can go through 1.1-alpha-2
>> > and decide what should be done, make a new release called 1.1-alpha-3
>> > and bulk move issues that aren't going to be addressed then (like
>> > maybe all the xml-rpc issues)
>> >
>> > I think we shouldn't worry about making these actually releases cut
>> > with the maven-release-plugin.  I say we just make a build and get it
>> > available for download.  Also tag the continuum trunk accordingly.
>> > Then we ought to try to release a new alpha every few weeks until we
>> > have the alpha-# issues converging towards 0.
>> >
>> > When we actually get to beta/rc releases then we can cut actual 
>> releases.
>> >
>> > Now about my allocation of issues, its not gospel!  If you disagree
>> > with any of my assigning of fix versions then just fix it yourself
>> > (the version, or better yet the bug).
>> >
>> > At the time of this writing I have the 1.1-alpha-1 release down to a
>> > modest 8 issues with a few of those questionable and/or waiting for a
>> > bit of feedback.  I have yet to go through the 200 or so unfiled
>> > issues though so that might go up a bit, I'll do that now.
>> >
>> > thoughts?
>> > jesse
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 3/7/07, Emmanuel Venisse <emmanuel@venisse.net> wrote:
>> > > We don't need it the migration tool now. We'll can see to it when 
>> we'll release a first beta on rc.
>> > >
>> > > Emmanuel
>> > >
>> > > Brett Porter a écrit :
>> > > >
>> > > > On 07/03/2007, at 9:52 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Ok, well the little poll thread I made seemed to be strongly in 
>> favor
>> > > >> of getting things pulled together to start getting alpha 
>> releases out
>> > > >> of continuum.  So with that in mind here is a list of a few things
>> > > >> that we need to get in order for an alpha release that I 
>> shamelessly
>> > > >> started base on bretts comments
>> > > >>
>> > > >> - properly mark up the model as it was for 1.0.3 release
>> > > >> - add methods to continuum-data-management to utilise that and 
>> then
>> > > >> make any necessary transformations (c-d-m will do the basic 1-to-1
>> > > >> conversions)
>> > > >> - probably write a little CLI to fire it off.
>> > > >> - vet jira for a 1.1 alpha 1 release version and maybe schedule 
>> out a
>> > > >> couple of alpha-# releases.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I think I'll start in on the data management bit now since that 
>> seems
>> > > >> like the biggest hurdle.  I am not convinced we really need to 
>> worry
>> > > >> about a continuum 1.0.3 -> continuum 1.1 migration 
>> ability...its not a
>> > > >> difficult thing to get projects loaded back up into 
>> continuum...but
>> > > >> we'll see I guess.
>> > > >
>> > > > It is a pain, but having said that we could potentially add it in a
>> > > > later milestone. I wouldn't want a final version without it.
>> > > >
>> > > >>
>> > > >> anyone have anything to add?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> jesse
>> > > >>
>> > > >> --jesse mcconnell
>> > > >> jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > jesse mcconnell
>> > jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
>> >
>>
> 
>