continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Thierry Lach" <thierry.l...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JPOX 1.1.7 ?
Date Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:22:36 GMT
Yeah, that was my thought also.

On 3/14/07, Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> have you tried it with postgres outside of jboss?  I want to narrow
> down the factors here
>
>
>
> On 3/14/07, Thierry Lach <thierry.lach@gmail.com> wrote:
> > That's right. I knew that patch for transaction levels didn't solve it
> on
> > its own, so my hopes got up with the mention of JPOX 1.1.7 and postgres
> last
> > week.
> >
> > On 3/13/07, Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I set the transaction lvls to READ_COMMITTED as well, so that didn't
> > > fix you either huh?
> > >
> > > hrm
> > >
> > > On 3/13/07, Thierry Lach <thierry.lach@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > JPOX 1.1.7 doesn't correct the problems with Postgres.  I've added
> an
> > > > updated stack trace to
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1181
> > > >
> > > > On 3/13/07, Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > yes, and I setup the bundled for m2 and got them into place about
> an
> > > > > hour ago...will be synced into the main repos sometime soon
> > > > >
> > > > > jesse
> > > > >
> > > > > On 3/13/07, Thierry Lach <thierry.lach@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Did JPOX 1.1.7 get released yesterday?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 3/7/07, Erik Bengtson <erik@jpox.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > FYI, JPOX 1.1.7 will be released next monday. It fixes
the
> issue
> > > with
> > > > > > > postgres.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You can try it out, if you like, before we release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > http://www.jpox.org/downloads/maven/jpox/jars/jpox-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Quoting Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ok, well the little poll thread I made seemed to be
strongly
> in
> > > > > favor
> > > > > > > > of getting things pulled together to start getting
alpha
> > > releases
> > > > > out
> > > > > > > > of continuum.  So with that in mind here is a list
of a few
> > > things
> > > > > > > > that we need to get in order for an alpha release
that I
> > > shamelessly
> > > > > > > > started base on bretts comments
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - properly mark up the model as it was for 1.0.3 release
> > > > > > > > - add methods to continuum-data-management to utilise
that
> and
> > > then
> > > > > > > > make any necessary transformations (c-d-m will do
the basic
> > > 1-to-1
> > > > > > > > conversions)
> > > > > > > > - probably write a little CLI to fire it off.
> > > > > > > > - vet jira for a 1.1 alpha 1 release version and maybe
> schedule
> > > out
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > couple of alpha-# releases.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think I'll start in on the data management bit now
since
> that
> > > > > seems
> > > > > > > > like the biggest hurdle.  I am not convinced we really
need
> to
> > > worry
> > > > > > > > about a continuum 1.0.3 -> continuum 1.1 migration
> ability...its
> > > not
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > difficult thing to get projects loaded back up into
> > > continuum...but
> > > > > > > > we'll see I guess.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > anyone have anything to add?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > jesse
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > jesse mcconnell
> > > > > > > > jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > jesse mcconnell
> > > > > jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > jesse mcconnell
> > > jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> jesse mcconnell
> jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message