continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik Bengtson <e...@jpox.org>
Subject Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1
Date Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:16:16 GMT
CLOB is supported by most of the databases, and Oracle is the only one with
a particular API rather than plain JDBC

Quoting Brett Porter <brett@apache.org>:

> Isn't Oracle the only database to offer a CLOB?
>
> I think writing it to a file in the build results directory like the
> other output makes perfect sense. Unless we are planning to search
> them, but then maybe lucene is a better choice anyway.
>
> Hmm, indexed and correlated build failures. I like that idea. Shiny. /
> me loses focus.
>
> - Brett
>
> On 12/03/2007, at 2:09 AM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
>
> > Jesse McConnell wrote:
> >> sounds good to me, imo either trunc it or maybe switch the model over
> >> to a clob for that in the db...
> >
> > I tried to make it a CLOB once but couldn't get it to work because
> > of some JPOX issues IIRC so for alpha-1 just chop the exception and/
> > or write it to a separate file and put the ideal solution into a
> > later alpha.
> >
> > Keep moving!
> >
> > --
> > Trygve
> >
> >> jesse
> >> On 3/9/07, Stephane Nicoll <stephane.nicoll@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On 3/9/07, Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > I have gone through jira issues there were assigned to 1.1 and
> >>> spread
> >>> > things out a bit.
> >>> >
> >>> > here is my criteria I used in separating out the issues:
> >>> >
> >>> > 1.1-alpha-1 -> issues that need to be addressed asap before we
> >>> pull
> >>> > any kinda alpha
> >>>
> >>> Not because I opened this but I think CONTINUUM-1194 should be
> >>> fixed.
> >>> I'll try to provide a patch this sunday for this. As a summary,
> >>> if an
> >>> error occurs and the stacktrace is higher than 8000 chars:
> >>>
> >>> * The build is stuck in Build In Progress
> >>> * No notification is triggered (an error has occured?!)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Stéphane
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> > 1.1-alpha-2 -> higher importance issues and ones generally
> >>> related to xml-rpc
> >>> > 1.1-alpha-# -> issues that probably ought to be resolved in the
> >>> alpha releases
> >>> > Future -> stuff that probably ain't going to get done any day soon
> >>> >
> >>> > the idea being that we can make new sequential release issues
> >>> off of
> >>> > the 1.1-alpha-# release tag until we are done with alpha
> >>> releases.  I
> >>> > think once 1.1-alpha-1 is released then we can go through 1.1-
> >>> alpha-2
> >>> > and decide what should be done, make a new release called 1.1-
> >>> alpha-3
> >>> > and bulk move issues that aren't going to be addressed then (like
> >>> > maybe all the xml-rpc issues)
> >>> >
> >>> > I think we shouldn't worry about making these actually releases
> >>> cut
> >>> > with the maven-release-plugin.  I say we just make a build and
> >>> get it
> >>> > available for download.  Also tag the continuum trunk accordingly.
> >>> > Then we ought to try to release a new alpha every few weeks
> >>> until we
> >>> > have the alpha-# issues converging towards 0.
> >>> >
> >>> > When we actually get to beta/rc releases then we can cut actual
> >>> releases.
> >>> >
> >>> > Now about my allocation of issues, its not gospel!  If you
> >>> disagree
> >>> > with any of my assigning of fix versions then just fix it yourself
> >>> > (the version, or better yet the bug).
> >>> >
> >>> > At the time of this writing I have the 1.1-alpha-1 release down
> >>> to a
> >>> > modest 8 issues with a few of those questionable and/or waiting
> >>> for a
> >>> > bit of feedback.  I have yet to go through the 200 or so unfiled
> >>> > issues though so that might go up a bit, I'll do that now.
> >>> >
> >>> > thoughts?
> >>> > jesse
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On 3/7/07, Emmanuel Venisse <emmanuel@venisse.net> wrote:
> >>> > > We don't need it the migration tool now. We'll can see to it
> >>> when we'll release a first beta on rc.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Emmanuel
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Brett Porter a écrit :
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > On 07/03/2007, at 9:52 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >> Ok, well the little poll thread I made seemed to be
> >>> strongly in favor
> >>> > > >> of getting things pulled together to start getting alpha
> >>> releases out
> >>> > > >> of continuum.  So with that in mind here is a list of
a
> >>> few things
> >>> > > >> that we need to get in order for an alpha release that
I
> >>> shamelessly
> >>> > > >> started base on bretts comments
> >>> > > >>
> >>> > > >> - properly mark up the model as it was for 1.0.3 release
> >>> > > >> - add methods to continuum-data-management to utilise
that
> >>> and then
> >>> > > >> make any necessary transformations (c-d-m will do the
> >>> basic 1-to-1
> >>> > > >> conversions)
> >>> > > >> - probably write a little CLI to fire it off.
> >>> > > >> - vet jira for a 1.1 alpha 1 release version and maybe
> >>> schedule out a
> >>> > > >> couple of alpha-# releases.
> >>> > > >>
> >>> > > >> I think I'll start in on the data management bit now
since
> >>> that seems
> >>> > > >> like the biggest hurdle.  I am not convinced we really
> >>> need to worry
> >>> > > >> about a continuum 1.0.3 -> continuum 1.1 migration
> >>> ability...its not a
> >>> > > >> difficult thing to get projects loaded back up into
> >>> continuum...but
> >>> > > >> we'll see I guess.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > It is a pain, but having said that we could potentially add
> >>> it in a
> >>> > > > later milestone. I wouldn't want a final version without
it.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >>
> >>> > > >> anyone have anything to add?
> >>> > > >>
> >>> > > >> jesse
> >>> > > >>
> >>> > > >> --jesse mcconnell
> >>> > > >> jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > jesse mcconnell
> >>> > jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
> >>> >
> >>>
>
>




Mime
View raw message