Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41911 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2007 01:45:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2007 01:45:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 2720 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2007 01:45:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-dev-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 2696 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2007 01:45:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact continuum-dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 2685 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2007 01:45:14 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:45:14 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: 210.54.141.241 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of rahul.thakur.xdev@gmail.com) Received: from [210.54.141.241] (HELO fep05.xtra.co.nz) (210.54.141.241) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:45:02 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.107] (really [222.155.216.21]) by fep05.xtra.co.nz with ESMTP id <20070112014438.CGJM7885.fep05.xtra.co.nz@[192.168.1.107]> for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:44:38 +1300 Message-ID: <45A6E804.3030805@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:44:36 +1300 From: Rahul Thakur User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: continuum-store and JDO References: <7288749d0701081927p249975e7q3985628f97b1ea1d@mail.gmail.com> <7288749d0701091731t691a17b8s47f19f49cf306fd7@mail.gmail.com> <45A5399D.6010506@venisse.net> <7288749d0701101701j265790c2td7ec065ad0c8358f@mail.gmail.com> <45A6B2A3.7080801@venisse.net> <7288749d0701111628j6c8e2aa8t80ca9054d5c69126@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7288749d0701111628j6c8e2aa8t80ca9054d5c69126@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Marcelo Fukushima wrote: > yeah... > but now that ive settled it, ive encountered a new set of probs, this > time in the data-management with the trunk on svn: > -while backing up the continuum store, a FileWriter is used (wich uses > default system char encoding), but the stream used to write the xml > tries to use utf-8, in wich case an exception is thrown; This is a known issue. I think its to do with locale settings. > -the backup file (an xml) is compared to a hard coded xml file... but > at least with my dev env (win xp with jdk6), some child nodes are > swaped... You mean the nodes _do_ exist _but_ in a different order. Can you point me to the test that is showing this behaviour? Cheers, Rahul > > the first one is most certainly a bug (and i already have a fix), > while the second one im not so sure so i wanted to ask yall first > > regards, > takeshi > > On 1/11/07, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: >> windows path length pb? >> >> Marcelo Fukushima a �crit : >> > im looking into it, but i cant seen to install the modules locally - >> > im getting a weird random access denied error... >> > >> > >> > On 1/10/07, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: >> >> Yes. A global patch would be better instead of separate patches. >> >> I tried your 2 patches and updated locally jpox-* to 1.1.3 in >> >> continuum parent pom. With them, all tests works fine, but continuum >> >> doesn't start. >> >> >> >> Emmanuel >> >> >> >> Marcelo Fukushima a �crit : >> >> > Hello dear devs. >> >> > >> >> > After everyone's help, ive noticed that jpox was saving the >> >> > BuildDefinition with wrong values (the buildFresh and arguments and >> >> > possibly others too)... since i dont know how jpox work, the first >> >> > thing i tried was to update to a more recent version of it (namely >> >> > 1.1.3) and everything worked fine... >> >> > im going to attach the test case to jira (actually a patch to the >> >> > testcase to check those things too), but should i attach a patch to >> >> > the pom too? >> >> > >> >> > On 1/9/07, Brett Porter wrote: >> >> >> The metadata file (and enhanced classes) are generated when you >> use >> >> >> Maven to build the project. As long as eclipse doesn't >> overwrite the >> >> >> class files it should be fine. Alternatively, you can use the >> eclipse >> >> >> plugin for jpox to make sure the classes get enhanced and just run >> >> >> maven once to generate the metadata file. I've never used that >> >> >> plugin, but it is available from the jpox site. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> - Brett >> >> >> >> >> >> On 09/01/2007, at 2:27 PM, Marcelo Fukushima wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > hello folks! i sent a couple of emails to the user list, but i >> >> guess i >> >> >> > could help a little too, right? so i just checked out the >> code from >> >> >> > SVN and wanted to tackle >> >> >> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1103 >> >> >> > while i could isolate the bug (the property is not getting >> persisted >> >> >> > on the db) but since i know almost nothing about jdo, i cant >> run the >> >> >> > tests inside eclipse to try to figure out the solution and i >> couldnt >> >> >> > find where the metadata file or the enhanced version of the >> classes >> >> >> > are found... >> >> >> > is there any doc that can help me with that kinda of info? >> thanks >> >> >> > in advance >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> > []'s >> >> >> > Marcelo Takeshi Fukushima >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> > >