Mailing-List: contact continuum-dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org
Received-SPF: softfail (herse.apache.org: transitioning domain of
 brianf@reply.infinity.nu does not designate 205.210.42.54 as permitted
 sender)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Subject: RE: Trusting in our own dog food
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:09:09 -0500
Message-ID: <2BABBE7D2A66E04DB8A66A527D29927E0BE274@intrepid.infinity.nu>
Thread-Topic: Trusting in our own dog food
Thread-Index: Acc4Vi0fGQTOW+qcQx6pFYH0lHsvfwAiqukg
From: "Brian E. Fox" <brianf@reply.infinity.nu>
To: <continuum-dev@maven.apache.org>

I'm pretty sure it does. The speed boost is due to a new diff algorithm
that both sides must use. You can also get some size improvements if you
dump/reimport the data into a new repository. On our repos it was around
20%.=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Brett Porter [mailto:brett@apache.org]=20
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 10:35 PM
To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Trusting in our own dog food

That doesn't actually matter for the client side speed boost. I'm
running 1.4.2 on continuum now.

- Brett

On 15/01/2007, at 2:21 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:

> The svn.apache.org server is a little old too: Powered by Subversion=20
> version 1.3.1 (r19032).
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:brett@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 6:46 PM
> To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Trusting in our own dog food
>
> yeah, it's subversion 1.1.4 (ouch!).
>
> I'm going to look at upgrading!
>
> On 11/01/2007, at 11:27 PM, Federico Yankelevich wrote:
>
>>
>> I read on svn changelog that SVN v1.4 increased a lot the speed for=20
>> comparing local copy with repository.
>> Maybe continuum is very slow in SVN update because it is using SVN
>> 1.3 (both
>> client and server needs to be updated)
>>
>> see http://subversion.tigris.org/svn_1.4_releasenotes.html
>>
>> just my 2 cents,
>> Federico
>>
>>
>>
>> brettporter wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, I have a script to automate installing the latest build (though

>>> would need changes if continuum_ci was turned off).
>>>
>>> 1.1 is running very well thanks to some sleuthing by Wendy and quick

>>> fixes from Emmanuel.
>>>
>>> My biggest concern is the scalability of polling. It currently takes

>>> about 30 minutes to just run through all the required svn up=20
>>> commands
>
>>> to detect if builds are needed for all the Maven projects.
>>>
>>> - Brett
>>>
>>> On 11/01/2007, at 10:26 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
>>>
>>>> good luck ;-)
>>>> did you update the 2.1 snapshot ?
>>>>
>>>> Arnaud
>>>>
>>>> On 1/11/07, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to turn off continuum_ci.sh and instead only use=20
>>>>> Continuum
>
>>>>> itself to do CI for Continuum. Any objections?
>>>>>
>>>>> - Brett
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Trusting-in-our-
>> own-dog-food-tf2955860.html#a8276485
>> Sent from the Continuum - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>