so... you're saying you don't trust our dog food? :)
The only thing it tests differently is:
- works by cron, whereas continuum might go down/hang/something else
(which is something we should work on fixing if it does, rather than
rely on ci.sh)
- runs a reactor (can add that as a less frequent build execution in
continuum too, though).
So, I don't see any reason to keep it - wdyt?
- Brett
On 11/01/2007, at 7:57 PM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
> Brett Porter wrote:
>> Folks,
>> I'd like to turn off continuum_ci.sh and instead only use
>> Continuum itself to do CI for Continuum. Any objections?
>
> I don't see why it should be turned off, but perhaps the automatic
> notifications can be turned off or just send failures. That way it
> would verify the product (it will in itself be an integration test)
> because if the Continuum instance says that something is failing,
> you should expect an email saying the same right after. Or at least
> you can check the logs directory if you're suspecting some other
> failure.
>
> --
> Trygve
|