continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Trusting in our own dog food
Date Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:09:34 GMT
was just pondering that myself.

shouldn't the default be that guest is a user on all project groups  
and we remove it to be more restrictive?

- Brett

On 18/01/2007, at 8:05 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:

> Is it normal that the projects list is empty when we aren't logon ?
>
> http://maven.zones.apache.org:8080/continuum/groupSummary.action
>
> Arnaud
>
> On 1/17/07, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Ok, fair enough. I've left it on, and made it use a different local
>> repository.
>>
>> I'd say once we release Continuum 1.1 and are happy it is stable
>> enough to use, we can turn this off.
>>
>> On 15/01/2007, at 11:02 PM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
>>
>> > Brett Porter wrote:
>> >> so... you're saying you don't trust our dog food? :)
>> >
>> > No, I'm saying it's there to verify the dog food. If there is no
>> > discrepancies between what the cron is saying and the C instance is
>> > saying, it's good. If there is an discrepancy it's not good.
>> >
>> > It will be more a tool to verification tool that a CI (but that
>> > might be two sides of the same story :)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Trygve
>> >
>> >> The only thing it tests differently is:
>> >> - works by cron, whereas continuum might go down/hang/something
>> >> else (which is something we should work on fixing if it does,
>> >> rather than rely on ci.sh)
>> >> - runs a reactor (can add that as a less frequent build execution
>> >> in continuum too, though).
>> >> So, I don't see any reason to keep it - wdyt?
>> >> - Brett
>> >> On 11/01/2007, at 7:57 PM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
>> >>> Brett Porter wrote:
>> >>>> Folks,
>> >>>> I'd like to turn off continuum_ci.sh and instead only use
>> >>>> Continuum itself to do CI for Continuum. Any objections?
>> >>>
>> >>> I don't see why it should be turned off, but perhaps the
>> >>> automatic notifications can be turned off or just send failures.
>> >>> That way it would verify the product (it will in itself be an
>> >>> integration test) because if the Continuum instance says that
>> >>> something is failing, you should expect an email saying the same
>> >>> right after. Or at least you can check the logs directory if
>> >>> you're suspecting some other failure.
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Trygve
>>

Mime
View raw message