continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Trygve Laugstøl <>
Subject Re: [vote] merge id-refactor branch changes
Date Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:46:36 GMT
Rahul Thakur wrote:
> [snip]
>> Can you please come up with a realistic use case where IDs would start 
>> on something other than 0 or 1? The database is controlled by 
>> Continuum and is an internal thing which we have complete control over.
> I don't have a specific use case for Continuum handy, but I guess 
> Continuum can be used in other products/projects. Not sure I understand 
> what you mean that the database is controlled by Continuum?

I mean that the database, it's tables and content is under Continuum's 
control and it's up to Continuum to define the types of its domain. In 
this case an int was chosen because the ability to have 4 billion 
projects is sufficient.

>>> IMHO the version change to 1.1 is a fair indication that the API 
>>> might have changed. Having said that, I will go with whatever most of 
>>> us think sounds practical :-)
>> The only thing you can do is to add stuff, not break existing code.
> Ok, agree on this one. Breaking API changes should be a change in major 
> version.



View raw message