continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Arnaud HERITIER" <aherit...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Trusting in our own dog food
Date Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:53:58 GMT
I just created an account and the list is also empty :-(

Arnaud

On 1/17/07, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:
>
> was just pondering that myself.
>
> shouldn't the default be that guest is a user on all project groups
> and we remove it to be more restrictive?
>
> - Brett
>
> On 18/01/2007, at 8:05 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
>
> > Is it normal that the projects list is empty when we aren't logon ?
> >
> > http://maven.zones.apache.org:8080/continuum/groupSummary.action
> >
> > Arnaud
> >
> > On 1/17/07, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Ok, fair enough. I've left it on, and made it use a different local
> >> repository.
> >>
> >> I'd say once we release Continuum 1.1 and are happy it is stable
> >> enough to use, we can turn this off.
> >>
> >> On 15/01/2007, at 11:02 PM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
> >>
> >> > Brett Porter wrote:
> >> >> so... you're saying you don't trust our dog food? :)
> >> >
> >> > No, I'm saying it's there to verify the dog food. If there is no
> >> > discrepancies between what the cron is saying and the C instance is
> >> > saying, it's good. If there is an discrepancy it's not good.
> >> >
> >> > It will be more a tool to verification tool that a CI (but that
> >> > might be two sides of the same story :)
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Trygve
> >> >
> >> >> The only thing it tests differently is:
> >> >> - works by cron, whereas continuum might go down/hang/something
> >> >> else (which is something we should work on fixing if it does,
> >> >> rather than rely on ci.sh)
> >> >> - runs a reactor (can add that as a less frequent build execution
> >> >> in continuum too, though).
> >> >> So, I don't see any reason to keep it - wdyt?
> >> >> - Brett
> >> >> On 11/01/2007, at 7:57 PM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
> >> >>> Brett Porter wrote:
> >> >>>> Folks,
> >> >>>> I'd like to turn off continuum_ci.sh and instead only use
> >> >>>> Continuum itself to do CI for Continuum. Any objections?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I don't see why it should be turned off, but perhaps the
> >> >>> automatic notifications can be turned off or just send failures.
> >> >>> That way it would verify the product (it will in itself be an
> >> >>> integration test) because if the Continuum instance says that
> >> >>> something is failing, you should expect an email saying the same
> >> >>> right after. Or at least you can check the logs directory if
> >> >>> you're suspecting some other failure.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> Trygve
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message