continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Trusting in our own dog food
Date Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:10:32 GMT
try now

On 18/01/2007, at 9:53 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:

> I just created an account and the list is also empty :-(
>
> Arnaud
>
> On 1/17/07, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> was just pondering that myself.
>>
>> shouldn't the default be that guest is a user on all project groups
>> and we remove it to be more restrictive?
>>
>> - Brett
>>
>> On 18/01/2007, at 8:05 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
>>
>> > Is it normal that the projects list is empty when we aren't logon ?
>> >
>> > http://maven.zones.apache.org:8080/continuum/groupSummary.action
>> >
>> > Arnaud
>> >
>> > On 1/17/07, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Ok, fair enough. I've left it on, and made it use a different  
>> local
>> >> repository.
>> >>
>> >> I'd say once we release Continuum 1.1 and are happy it is stable
>> >> enough to use, we can turn this off.
>> >>
>> >> On 15/01/2007, at 11:02 PM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Brett Porter wrote:
>> >> >> so... you're saying you don't trust our dog food? :)
>> >> >
>> >> > No, I'm saying it's there to verify the dog food. If there is no
>> >> > discrepancies between what the cron is saying and the C  
>> instance is
>> >> > saying, it's good. If there is an discrepancy it's not good.
>> >> >
>> >> > It will be more a tool to verification tool that a CI (but that
>> >> > might be two sides of the same story :)
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Trygve
>> >> >
>> >> >> The only thing it tests differently is:
>> >> >> - works by cron, whereas continuum might go down/hang/something
>> >> >> else (which is something we should work on fixing if it does,
>> >> >> rather than rely on ci.sh)
>> >> >> - runs a reactor (can add that as a less frequent build  
>> execution
>> >> >> in continuum too, though).
>> >> >> So, I don't see any reason to keep it - wdyt?
>> >> >> - Brett
>> >> >> On 11/01/2007, at 7:57 PM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
>> >> >>> Brett Porter wrote:
>> >> >>>> Folks,
>> >> >>>> I'd like to turn off continuum_ci.sh and instead only use
>> >> >>>> Continuum itself to do CI for Continuum. Any objections?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I don't see why it should be turned off, but perhaps the
>> >> >>> automatic notifications can be turned off or just send  
>> failures.
>> >> >>> That way it would verify the product (it will in itself be
an
>> >> >>> integration test) because if the Continuum instance says that
>> >> >>> something is failing, you should expect an email saying the
 
>> same
>> >> >>> right after. Or at least you can check the logs directory if
>> >> >>> you're suspecting some other failure.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> --
>> >> >>> Trygve
>> >>
>>

Mime
View raw message